These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10247617)
1. Federal Appeals Court affirms National Gerimedical ruling of antitrust exemption for health planning. Schwartz R Health Law Vigil; 1980 Aug; 3(16):5-6. PubMed ID: 10247617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Narrow ruling on blanket antitrust exemption substantially preserves health planning status quo. Schwartz RL Health Law Vigil; 1981 Jun; 4(13):1-3. PubMed ID: 10251769 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The health planning process and federal antitrust statutes: is there a health planning exemption? Prebil RL Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1983 Mar; 5(1):7-34. PubMed ID: 10258900 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Antitrust implications of health planning: National Gerimedical Hospital and Gerontology Center v. Blue Cross of Kansas City. Chase JB Am J Law Med; 1982; 8(3):321-48. PubMed ID: 7168454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. U.S. Supreme Court could immunize planning from antitrust examination. Proger PA Mod Healthc; 1981 Jun; 11(6):128, 130. PubMed ID: 10251563 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Decision suggests High Court will scrutinize repeal of antitrust laws. Proger PA Mod Healthc; 1981 Aug; 11(8):92, 96. PubMed ID: 10252056 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Federal courts review scope of antitrust immunity. Moses RJ Health Law Vigil; 1982 May; 5(10):suppl 3-4. PubMed ID: 10255187 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Court lifts ban on enforcing Miss. anti-abortion law. Denniston L Sun; 1992 Aug; ():3A. PubMed ID: 12286287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The health care industry and antitrust: a continuing exploration. Weissburg C; Waxman JM Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1983; 16(4):57, 60. PubMed ID: 10260804 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Antitrust and health planning. Berriman WT Medicoleg News; 1981 Jun; 9(3):4-9. PubMed ID: 10252038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Appeals Court limits antitrust review of physician-hospital disputes. Christensen JD Health Law Vigil; 1988 Sep; 11(19):3-4. PubMed ID: 10288887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The year in review: significant health antitrust cases. Miles JJ Health Law Vigil; 1986 Jun; 9(11):3-7. PubMed ID: 10276706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Health planning--an overview. Richie ND Am J Health Plann; 1978 Apr; 3(2):36-42. PubMed ID: 10307190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinton and appeals court signal death knell for Title X gag rule. Wash Memo Alan Guttmacher Inst; 1992 Nov; (17):1-2. PubMed ID: 12344619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality health care and the antitrust laws: can they really coexist peacefully? Klein JI Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1981; 14(3):33-5. PubMed ID: 10251323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Health planning. Griffith JT Am J Med Technol; 1979 Nov; 45(11):974-5. PubMed ID: 507107 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Justice still pondering antitrust implications in planning law. Health Plann Manpow Rep; 1978 Nov; 7(23):6. PubMed ID: 10277904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The confrontation between national health planning and the federal anti-trust laws. Curran WJ Am J Public Health; 1980 Apr; 70(4):425-6. PubMed ID: 7361967 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact and implications of the new health planning guidelines. Appelbaum AL; Lively CA Hosp Med Staff; 1977 Nov; 6(11):28-35. PubMed ID: 10305333 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Reconciling the antitrust laws and the health care laws. Berg RN J Med Assoc Ga; 1980 Feb; 69(2):127-9. PubMed ID: 7373169 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]