BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10247746)

  • 1. The voluntary effort: how to put $ lid on.
    Radiol Manage; 1980; 2(4):39-40. PubMed ID: 10247746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reject film study. Cost and quality considerations in a radiology department.
    Glaser SM; Dehn TG
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1980 Jun; 6(6):19-22. PubMed ID: 6773009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Radiology can save through film and scan reductions.
    Brightbill T
    Hosp Mater Manage; 1989 Jan; 14(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 10291416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. DRG cost-per-case management. Cost-cutting drive tags imaging.
    Kuntz EF
    Mod Healthc; 1984 Feb; 14(3):150, 152. PubMed ID: 10310470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In the radiology department trim costs with two management tools.
    Conine TA; Aders DM
    Hosp Financ Manage; 1980 Sep; 34(9):28-31, 34-5. PubMed ID: 10248664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Controlling clinical equipment maintenance costs.
    Bluemke DH
    Adm Radiol; 1989 May; 8(5):18-20, 22. PubMed ID: 10293539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost containment through information management.
    Bauman RA
    Appl Radiol; 1985; 14(1):19, 21. PubMed ID: 10300041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost containment in radiology.
    Sublette H
    Radiol Manage; 1980 Dec; 3(1):2-4. PubMed ID: 10249845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Checking the impulse to x-ray.
    McClenahan JL
    Hosp Med Staff; 1979 May; 8(5):23-8. PubMed ID: 10241376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of the radiology manager in the VE.
    Earle PW
    Radiol Manage; 1981 Sep; 3(4):21-3. PubMed ID: 10253294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Staying even with the board. Impact of new regulations on operational well being.
    Hoppszallern S; Hughes CM
    Adm Radiol; 1988 Nov; 7(11):30-2. PubMed ID: 10303060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cost effectiveness: radiologic services.
    Lucas SJ
    Ohio State Med J; 1979 May; 75(5):290-3. PubMed ID: 111190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparability of radiology departments.
    Conway JB
    Radiol Manage; 1980 Apr; 2(3):14-20. PubMed ID: 10246476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The economic management of a district hospital X-ray department--a personal view.
    Rose JF
    Health Trends; 1987 Nov; 19(4):17-9. PubMed ID: 10285231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speaking out: the new environment for radiology.
    Neuhauser D
    Appl Radiol; 1984; 13(3):16, 23. PubMed ID: 10310645
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. TEFRA puts the squeeze on radiology.
    Falck S
    Appl Radiol; 1983; 12(4):19-22, 25. PubMed ID: 10310161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nonionic contrast agents: clinical and cost considerations.
    Wolf G
    Radiol Manage; 1986 Jul; 8(3):66-8. PubMed ID: 10311703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Radiology cost containment through management information and control.
    Fause S
    Radiol Manage; 1984 Mar; 6(2):31-4. PubMed ID: 10273492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prospective reimbursement--its impact on planning in radiology.
    Osborn R
    Radiol Manage; 1984 Sep; 6(4):3-7. PubMed ID: 10299801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Radiologists take a stand on rising costs.
    Minaker H
    Health Care (Don Mills); 1985 May; 27(4):36-7. PubMed ID: 10271455
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.