BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

517 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10248196)

  • 1. Federal regulations of labor-management relations.
    Davis CD
    Tex Hosp; 1980 Aug; 36(3):40-1. PubMed ID: 10248196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The grievance-arbitration process. The experience of one nursing administration.
    Fay MS; Morrill AK
    J Nurs Adm; 1985 Jun; 15(6):11-6. PubMed ID: 3846615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Managing safety and health.
    Harrison AJ
    Labor Law J; 1981 Oct; 32(10):635-58 concl. PubMed ID: 10253201
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hospitals target of wrongful discharge litigation.
    Burda D
    Hospitals; 1987 Sep; 61(17):58, 60. PubMed ID: 3623448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Managing a discrimination case.
    McConnell CR; Blankopf M
    Health Care Superv; 1989 Oct; 8(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 10295841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sexual harassment issues in the workplace.
    Hall CR
    QRC Advis; 1990 Sep; 6(11):1-4. PubMed ID: 10105974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Final and binding arbitration: a sensible alternative to expensive employment litigation.
    Pincus SR
    J Health Hosp Law; 1989 Nov; 22(11):343-9. PubMed ID: 10313792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What hospitals have to fear from labor law reform.
    Hosp Prog; 1978 Sep; 59(9):8, 12. PubMed ID: 680685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sexual harassment: third party issues.
    Candris LA
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1990 Sep; 7(11):1-5. PubMed ID: 10106008
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Your grievance procedures alone will not protect you.
    Kaye GH; Burke EM
    Nurs Manage; 1990 Feb; 21(2):24-7. PubMed ID: 2300327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selecting an arbitrator for a discrimination grievance. Elements to be aware of.
    Wrong EG
    Pers Adm; 1983 Jan; 28(1):58-9, 74. PubMed ID: 10258038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Employment-at-will doctrine eroding.
    Cleveland HC
    Hosp Manager; 1986; 16(6):4-5. PubMed ID: 10279270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Labour arbitration: assumptions aren't good enough.
    MacFarlane SJ
    Health Care (Don Mills); 1981 Feb; 23(2):17. PubMed ID: 10250151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clearly defined grievance policy forestalls discrimination suit.
    Regan WA
    Hosp Prog; 1982 Oct; 63(10):72. PubMed ID: 10256557
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Medication error: court vacates "reinstatement order". Case in point: Russell Memorial Hosp. v United Steelworkers (720 F. Supp. 583--MI (1-89)).
    Tammelleo AD
    Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1989 Dec; 30(7):4. PubMed ID: 2616770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Narrowing an employer's right to present views, arguments, or opinions against union representation.
    Brown TP
    Employee Relat Law J; 1983; 9(2):336-42. PubMed ID: 10262703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trends in hospital labor relations.
    Mulcahy RW; Rader DW
    Labor Law J; 1980 Feb; 31(2):100-14. PubMed ID: 10245506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Strong internal grievance procedure may forestall employees' civil suits.
    Regan WA
    Hosp Prog; 1982 Jul; 63(7):92-3. PubMed ID: 10255977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. From grievance through arbitration: a supervisor's perspective.
    Petersen DJ
    Health Care Superv; 1984 Jul; 2(4):48-67. PubMed ID: 10266419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Case study: a hospital labor organization attempt calls for a union prevention education program.
    Heffernan PJ
    Case Stud Health Adm; 1987; 6():60-4; discussion 64-5. PubMed ID: 10313576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.