257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10248392)
1. Blues have right to trim payments.
Horty JF
Mod Healthc; 1980 Jul; 10(7):133, 136. PubMed ID: 10248392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Insurance Bureau, the Blues and the prospective reimbursement system.
Cohn A
Mich Hosp; 1978 Aug; 14(8):8-11. PubMed ID: 10308444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. St. Francis Hospital takes on the Blues.
Haradine J
Mich Hosp; 1978 Mar; 14(3):21-2. PubMed ID: 10306418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Blues' discount policy seen as antitrust issue.
Burda D
Hospitals; 1986 Nov; 60(21):36. PubMed ID: 3770662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. "Blues interfered illegally with HMO.".
Burda D
Mod Healthc; 1987 Nov; 17(24):12. PubMed ID: 10284683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. FTC eyes ban of M.D. input into HMOs, Blues.
Mod Healthc; 1979 Dec; 9(12):32. PubMed ID: 503022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Challenge to Blues' tax-exemption seen as signal to healthcare industry.
Anderson HJ; Baldwin MF
Mod Healthc; 1985 Dec; 15(25):18-20. PubMed ID: 10274654
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Court decisions give Blues plans one win, one loss in separate antitrust cases.
Halper HR; Kazon PM
Bus Health; 1987 Mar; 4(5):51-2. PubMed ID: 10280673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Blues expand cost-cutting efforts despite lawsuits.
Maes J
Bus Insur; 1979 Feb; 13(4):1, 88. PubMed ID: 10316766
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Blue Cross plans, with a hand--or a shove--from state government, try new payment schemes.
Friedman E
Hospitals; 1983 Oct; 57(19):80, 83. PubMed ID: 6885034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimizing antitrust risks of Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans.
Steele CJ
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():227-72. PubMed ID: 10288422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient challenged Blue Cross denial of ER payment.
Regan WA
Hosp Prog; 1978 Nov; 59(11):82, 83, 90. PubMed ID: 700687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. More hospitals join fight against Ohio Blues plans.
Burda D
Hospitals; 1986 May; 60(9):54. PubMed ID: 3699797
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Legal challenges test relationships between Ohio hospitals, Blues plans.
Richman D
Mod Healthc; 1986 Jul; 16(14):74. PubMed ID: 10277194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Va. report: drop special rules for Blues.
Natl Underwrit Life Health; 1978 Nov; 82(44):2, 26. PubMed ID: 10238875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Antitrust implications of "all-inclusive" payment methodologies: the Empire Blue Cross decision.
Miles JJ
Health Law Vigil; 1987 Jun; 10(13):5-7. PubMed ID: 10282184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Plan contracts with providers: cost containment objectives amid conflicting legislative schemes.
Heitler G; Ader M
J Leg Med; 1981 Sep; 2(3):265-96. PubMed ID: 6976401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Health planning and anti-trust law.
Healey JM
Conn Med; 1981 Aug; 45(8):533. PubMed ID: 7273756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Empire Blues suing New York to obtain higher rate increase.
Pallarito K
Mod Healthc; 1992 Aug; 22(31):6. PubMed ID: 10119618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Antitrust issues in health care planning.
Decker R
Hosp Purch Manage; 1982 Feb; 7(2):14-6. PubMed ID: 10254100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
