125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10249004)
1. Word processing eliminates use of outside transcription service.
Kahl K; Vlazny J; Casey D
J Am Med Rec Assoc (1980); 1980 Oct; 51(5):74-8. PubMed ID: 10249004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Measuring productivity in word processing.
Wendling J
Dimens Health Serv; 1981 Jan; 58(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 7202880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Contract transcription services--cost containment decision.
Stromgren B
J Am Med Rec Assoc (1980); 1980 Oct; 51(5):79-83. PubMed ID: 10249005
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness analysis as applied to contract transcription service.
Slade D
Top Health Rec Manage; 1980 Sep; 1(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 10309404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Outside transcription services: a cost-effective alternative to in-house word processing.
Demster G
Top Health Rec Manage; 1983 Sep; 4(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 10262553
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Centralized word processing: a cost-containment measure.
Johnson GH
Top Health Rec Manage; 1980 Sep; 1(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 10309403
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Transcription incentive plan.
Picukaric JM
J Am Med Rec Assoc (1980); 1980 Oct; 51(5):84-90. PubMed ID: 10304451
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. One hospital's approach to word processing.
Schwartz J
Med Rec News; 1977 Feb; 48(1):94. PubMed ID: 10305609
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The budgeting process.
Iacobelli LP
Top Health Rec Manage; 1986 Dec; 7(2):43-50. PubMed ID: 10285936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A cost justification: word processing in a medical transcription environment.
Bifano JL
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Oct; 54(10):13-7. PubMed ID: 10310237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The CPA's review of the medical record department for a certified financial audit.
Harsh MA; Bernstein KR
Top Health Rec Manage; 1986 Dec; 7(2):51-8. PubMed ID: 10285937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Productivity study pays big dividends.
Schumann RH; Sanderson RC; White CA
Hospitals; 1980 Sep; 54(18):80, 81-2. PubMed ID: 7399463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Popularity of word processing spreads from medical records to other units.
Cost Containment; 1981 Jul; 3(14):7. PubMed ID: 10251923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Iowa Methodist Hospital saves space and money with in-house microfilm system.
J Am Med Rec Assoc (1980); 1980 Aug; 51(4):82-4. PubMed ID: 10304449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Selecting a data abstracting service.
Adams RP
Med Rec News; 1977 Feb; 48(1):38, 40. PubMed ID: 10305601
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective payment system.
Cofer J
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Apr; 54(4):17-8. PubMed ID: 10309939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Obtaining a grant: a collaborative effort.
Pavoni MM; Noorani Z
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1987 Jul; 58(7):18-20. PubMed ID: 10282653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiology can save through film and scan reductions.
Brightbill T
Hosp Mater Manage; 1989 Jan; 14(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 10291416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Filing equipment alternatives for medical record storage.
Coorough M
Top Health Rec Manage; 1984 Sep; 5(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 10268138
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficient and effective abstracting: patient information reporting system is the answer.
Copeland B
Comput Hosp; 1981; 2(4):26-8. PubMed ID: 10253389
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
