227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10249223)
1. The impact of regimentation on radiology departments.
Roberts JW
Radiol Manage; 1980; 2(5):60-5. PubMed ID: 10249223
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of government regulation on radiology.
Rossi RP
Radiol Manage; 1980; 2(2):22-30. PubMed ID: 10245600
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. NRC's new enforcement policy could cost hospitals up to $100,000 for non-compliance: medical community criticizes regulations' lack of clarity.
Fuson B
Health Law Vigil; 1980 Dec; 3(25):2-4. PubMed ID: 10248996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Repeat analysis in radiology: a method of quality control.
Dodd BC
Can J Radiogr Radiother Nucl Med; 1983; 14(2):37-40. PubMed ID: 10262102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality control issues. Governing the radiation physicist.
Tolbert DD; Hubbard LB; Bushong SC; Khan FM; Payne JT
Adm Radiol; 1989 Sep; 8(9):46-50, 52. PubMed ID: 10294846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. What does the JCAH look for in evaluating the quality of a hospital's radiology department?
Affeldt JE
Hosp Med Staff; 1982 Aug; 11(8):18-20. PubMed ID: 10289353
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Is 'radiology on demand' dead?
Roberts JW; Settich JF
Hospitals; 1984 Oct; 58(20):80-2, 87. PubMed ID: 6434402
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Moving toward physician accountability in quality assurance.
Thrall JH; Athanasoulis CA
Adm Radiol; 1989 Nov; 8(11):36-9, 41-2. PubMed ID: 10296510
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Keeping the bugs out of radiology: a need for infection control.
Ehrenpreis J; Sorandes TT
Radiol Technol; 1977; 49(2):160-9. PubMed ID: 905561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What are the JCAH's guidelines for reviewing the quality and appropriateness of care provided by support services, such as the radiology department?
Affeldt JE
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Feb; 54(2):49. PubMed ID: 10309865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Not even members agree.
Mallozzi R
Adm Radiol; 1990 May; 9(5):27-9. PubMed ID: 10104610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiology workload measurement project: an update.
Radiol Manage; 1986; 8(4):69-71. PubMed ID: 10279929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Draft recommendations for evaluation of radiation exposure in diagnostic radiology examinations.
Burkhart RL; Gross RE; Jans RG; McCrohan JL; Reuter FG; Rosenstein M
Radiol Manage; 1983 Sep; 5(4):34-41. PubMed ID: 10263551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Agencies use education more than regulation to lower X-ray exposure.
Knutson T
Mod Healthc; 1980 Sep; 10(9):91. PubMed ID: 10268181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. How to get the best x-rays for your patients' money.
Cunningham JJ
Med Econ; 1989 Jun; 66(11):121-3. PubMed ID: 10293378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. An analysis of the new JCAH standards.
Dixon RL; Tolbert DD
Adm Radiol; 1988 Jan; 7(1):35-6. PubMed ID: 10289817
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality assurance programs for diagnostic radiology facilities: Food and Drug Administration. Final recommendation.
Fed Regist; 1979 Dec; 44(239):71728-40. PubMed ID: 10244502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The economics of mammography quality assurance.
Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW
Adm Radiol; 1989 Sep; 8(9):38-40. PubMed ID: 10294844
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The American College of Radiology Mammography Accreditation Program.
Meyer P; Zinninger M; Wilcox P
Adm Radiol; 1990 Aug; 9(8):27-8, 30, 33-6. PubMed ID: 10106046
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality control in diagnostic radiology: (an update for Ontario).
Kruger GW
Dimens Health Serv; 1978 Sep; 55(9):42. PubMed ID: 689327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
