214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10249391)
1. Court upholds hospital's exclusive contract service.
Regan WA
Hosp Prog; 1981 Jan; 62(1):66. PubMed ID: 10249391
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. District Court upholds exclusive radiology contract in one-hospital town.
Blackmond B
Health Law Vigil; 1988 Dec; 11(25):4-5. PubMed ID: 10290724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Kentucky case supports hospital's right to enter exclusive contracts.
Horty J
Mod Healthc; 1984 Oct; 14(13):178-9. PubMed ID: 10268407
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Court upholds Catholic hospital's right to close a service.
Kadzielski MA
Health Prog; 1989 Sep; 70(7):60. PubMed ID: 10294412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Court examines radiologist's displacement after loss of exclusive contract.
Hosp Law Newsl; 1990 Oct; 7(12):5-8. PubMed ID: 10106265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Supreme Court approves hospital's exclusive contract.
Comiskey MP; Cullinane JS
Hosp Prog; 1984 May; 65(5):24-5. PubMed ID: 10266501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Contract radiologists alleged that hospital breached agreement.
Regan WA
Hosp Prog; 1978 Sep; 59(9):112. PubMed ID: 680673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Exclusive physician contracts in hospitals: precedent cases for radiologic practice.
James AE; Pendergrass HP; Robinson R; Hamilton RJ; Rollo FD; Hollowell E
Adm Radiol; 1987 May; 6(5):14-7. PubMed ID: 10282904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effective hospital corporation bylaws provide due process procedures.
Regan WA
Hosp Prog; 1982 May; 63(5):64-5. PubMed ID: 10255168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Vicarious liability and hospital-based physicians.
Zaremski MJ
Appl Radiol; 1988 Jan; 17(1):27-8. PubMed ID: 10285950
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Supreme Court upholds exclusive contract against antitrust challenge in Hyde case.
Tomaselli LA
Health Law Vigil; 1984 Apr; 7(8):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 10265826
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Despite contracted radiologist, staff uses other consultants.
Ragan WA
Hosp Prog; 1978 Jan; 59(1):34, 40. PubMed ID: 621049
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Virginia legal battle highlights unrest between hospitals, physicians.
Perry L
Mod Healthc; 1990 Sep; 20(37):34-6. PubMed ID: 10106197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Supreme Court upholds exclusive contract in Hyde antitrust decision.
Reed TJ; Allen HS
Hosp Med Staff; 1984 May; 13(5):2-9. PubMed ID: 10266239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Coastal Neuro-Psychiatric broadens state action exemption protection for hospital credentialing decisions.
Lipsetts PG
Health Law Vigil; 1986 Aug; 9(17):9-11. PubMed ID: 10278410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. U.S. Supreme Court hears oral arguments in antitrust/exclusive contract action.
Tomaselli LA
Health Law Vigil; 1983 Nov; 6(23):4-5. PubMed ID: 10263299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Court upholds exclusive contract between physician, public hospital.
Horty J
Mod Healthc; 1985 Nov; 15(23):196. PubMed ID: 10274286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Supreme Court relaxes exclusive contract rules in antitrust decision.
Reed TJ; Allen HS
Trustee; 1984 Jun; 37(6):34-8. PubMed ID: 10266797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exclusive contracts--a new court interpretation.
Manson JN
AANA J; 1982 Dec; 50(6):583-4. PubMed ID: 7164762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. FTC advises Illinois hospital that exclusive radiology contract does not violate antitrust law.
Tomaselli LA
Health Law Vigil; 1983 Apr; 6(7):4-5. PubMed ID: 10258693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
