These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10249748)

  • 1. NY court issues 'right-to-die' guidelines.
    Fama AJ
    Hosp Med Staff; 1981 Jan; 10(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 10249748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New York Court outlines procedures for ending life support.
    Schwartz R
    Health Law Vigil; 1980 May; 3(9):6-7. PubMed ID: 10247626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The constitutional dimensions of the right to refuse medically assisted nutrition and hydration: an analysis of Cruzan.
    Karbal W
    J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Aug; 23(8):241-8, 256. PubMed ID: 10113286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Right to die": an update.
    Weyhing RL; Sullivan MJ
    Mich Hosp; 1985 Jun; 21(6):15-7. PubMed ID: 10271591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Washington Supreme Court decides case re: removal of life support systems.
    Ahern ML
    Health Law Vigil; 1985 Jan; 8(2):11-2. PubMed ID: 10269741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New York Court of Appeals reviews Eichner and companion termination of treatment case.
    Schwartz RL
    Health Law Vigil; 1981 Apr; 4(8):6-7. PubMed ID: 10250672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Quinlan case: death decision by committee.
    Annas GJ
    New Physician; 1979 Feb; 28(2):53-4, 56. PubMed ID: 10240660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In the shadow of Karen Quinlan.
    Bennett SA
    Trial; 1976 Sep; 12(9):36-41. PubMed ID: 11664653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. When vitalism is dead wrong: the discrimination against and torture of incompetent patients by compulsory life-sustaining treatment.
    Ouellette AR
    Indiana Law J; 2004; 79(1):1-55. PubMed ID: 16189901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Live or let die; who decides an incompetent's fate? In re Storar and In re Eichner.
    Bates KW
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1982; 1982(2):387-400. PubMed ID: 11655681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Decision to withhold or withdraw support.
    McGrath RB
    Indiana Med; 1989 Mar; 82(3):196-8. PubMed ID: 2708805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The right to die: medico-legal implications of In re Quinlan.
    Hirsh HL; Donovan RE
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1977; 30(2):267-303. PubMed ID: 11661462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New Jersey's 'right-to-die' cases: a view from the ring.
    Nevins M
    Am Coll Physicians Obs; 1986 Mar; 6(3):13-6. PubMed ID: 10311536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The right to refuse life-sustaining medical treatment: national trend and recent changes in Maryland law.
    Goldmeier KE
    MD Law Rev; 1994; 53(4):1306-43. PubMed ID: 12599354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 'Right-to-die' theory upheld in New Jersey.
    Rust M
    Am Med News; 1985 Feb; 28(5):1, 23. PubMed ID: 11653617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
    Keilitz I; Bilzor JC; Hafemeister TL; Brown V; Dudyshyn D
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Substituted judgment in medical decision making for incompetent persons: In re Storar.
    Williams SE
    Wis L Rev; 1982; 1982(6):1173-98. PubMed ID: 11651834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The state's interest in the preservation of life: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
    Peters PG
    Ohio State Law J; 1989; 50(4):891-977. PubMed ID: 16044607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The right to die versus the right to live--who decides? The long and wandering road to a legislative solution.
    Mazzeo KE
    Albany Law Rev; 2002-2003; 66(1):263-87. PubMed ID: 12484391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Confusion in right to die ideology: impact of ethical decision making for treatment of an incompetent client.
    Harner SR
    Georget J Leg Ethics; 1991; 4(4):869-98. PubMed ID: 12186076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.