These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10249748)
21. Medical decisionmaking for the incompetent person: a comprehensive approach. Marzen TJ Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):293-317. PubMed ID: 11651815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Death, dying and the law: a prosecutorial view of the Quinlan case. Collester DG Rutgers Law Rev; 1977; 30(2):304-28. PubMed ID: 11661463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Bioethics in the courts: summaries of selected judicial decisions, 1989 to 1995. Nelson LJ Clin Ethics Rep; 1995; 9(1-2):1-20. PubMed ID: 11653201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Sounding board. The New York Court of appeals rules on the rights of incompetent dying patients. The conclusion of the Brother Fox case. Paris JJ N Engl J Med; 1981 Jun; 304(23):1424-5. PubMed ID: 7231467 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Right to die--court requires clear and convincing evidence of persistent vegetative patient's intent to terminate life-sustaining procedures; Health Care Decisions Act of 1993 casts new light on outcome. Brindisi TJ Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1994; 23(2):619-44. PubMed ID: 16086514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bludworth. Paulus SM Issues Law Med; 1985 Sep; 1(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 11643875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Nat Hentoff on the babies Doe. McFadden JP; Hentoff N Hum Life Rev; 1984; 10(2):73-104. PubMed ID: 11651744 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Before and after Cruzan in Illinois: a State Supreme Court addresses the issue of withholding nutrition and hydration from an incompetent patient. Carroll D J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Sep; 23(9):257-63, 266, 286. PubMed ID: 10106137 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The legal and moral aspects of termination of life-support systems: a discussion. Loeffelholz JP; Madden MC; Morgan WK; Tooley WH Respir Care; 1977 Oct; 22(10):1146-56. PubMed ID: 10314821 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Withdrawal of nutrition and hydration from an incompetent patient: legal developments leading to Cruzan. Garvey MA J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Aug; 23(8):225-40, 255. PubMed ID: 10113285 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Therefore, choose death. Brown ML Human Rights; 1982; 10(3):38-45. PubMed ID: 11651709 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. In re Bayer. Di Somma AV Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):119-21. PubMed ID: 11644471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The right to die--should a doctor decide? Barnard C; Pellegrino ED US News World Rep; 1975 Nov; 79(18):53-4. PubMed ID: 11662189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Delio v. Westchester County Medical Center. Kirkpatrick GA Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 11644323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The tragic case of Karen Ann Quinlan. Healey JM Conn Med; 1979 Jun; 43(6):399. PubMed ID: 11643501 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Whose rite is it anyway?: the search for a constitutional permit to die. Berman MB Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1992; 22(1):105-58. PubMed ID: 11656255 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [Euthanasia without request--euthanasia in impaired judgment]. Lauter H Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1993 Jan; 87(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 8442366 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Withholding life-prolonging medical treatment from the institutionalized person--who decides? Corbett KA; Raciti RM New Engl J Prison Law; 1976; 3(1):47-83. PubMed ID: 11664738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Right-to-die damage actions: developments in the law. Miller DH Denver Univ Law Rev; 1988; 65(2-3):181-212. PubMed ID: 11659201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]