These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10249849)

  • 21. Reviewing performance appraisal policies can lead to improved worker health.
    Rosen RH
    Bus Health; 1984 Sep; 1(9):54. PubMed ID: 10267658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Multiple rater performance appraisals: solutions for hospital personnel.
    Boissoneau RA; Edwards MR
    Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1985; 30(2):54-66. PubMed ID: 10270712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Characteristics of viable incentive plans.
    Browdy JD
    Top Health Care Financ; 1989; 16(2):19-24. PubMed ID: 2617533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Performance review guidelines revisited.
    Zielski K
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1983 Feb; 37(2):76-7. PubMed ID: 10315281
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Using results to rate performance.
    English JW; Gottesman JI
    Health Serv Manager; 1980 Oct; 13(10):7-8. PubMed ID: 10248518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Performance appraisal is not enough.
    Council JD; Plachy RJ
    J Nurs Adm; 1980 Oct; 10(10):20-6. PubMed ID: 6903581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Getting the most out of performance appraisals.
    Gubman EL
    Manage Rev; 1984 Nov; 73(11):44-8. PubMed ID: 10269466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. MJS: management by job standards.
    Hoffman RR
    Pers J; 1979 Aug; 58(8):536-40, 555. PubMed ID: 10243304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Development of a model performance appraisal system.
    Lemay AP; Mull V
    Top Hosp Pharm Manage; 1988 May; 8(1):48-61. PubMed ID: 10314287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Community health nurses. An evaluation test].
    Wiacek M
    Pieleg Polozna; 1985; (1):9-10. PubMed ID: 3846303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Evaluation of the work of the teacher].
    Frolov SS
    Voen Med Zh; 1988 Aug; (8):19-22. PubMed ID: 3195089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Health care manager's notebook: performance appraisals.
    Hengesbach J; Buschmohle MJ
    Hosp Forum; 1981; 24(6):45-8. PubMed ID: 10253069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Criteria-based performance appraisals.
    Lerch EM
    Nurs Manage; 1982 Jul; 13(7):28-30. PubMed ID: 6920625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Increasing performance appraisal effectiveness: matching task types, appraisal process, and rater training.
    Lee C
    Acad Manage Rev; 1985 Apr; 10(2):322-31. PubMed ID: 10271248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Personnel evaluation in nursing].
    Sotomayor A
    Bol Col Prof Enferm P R; 1983 Jun; 9(34):9-13. PubMed ID: 6590066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Performance appraisal: evaluating the evaluation.
    Brucks A
    Health Care Superv; 1985 Jul; 3(4):17-30. PubMed ID: 10272213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Performance appraisal: if only people were not involved.
    Nalbandian J
    Public Adm Rev; 1981; 41(3):392-6. PubMed ID: 10251866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Telling subordinates what to do and how to do it.
    English JW; Gottesman JI
    Superv Manage; 1979 Jul; 24(7):21-4. PubMed ID: 10242789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Staff development. Appraisals reassessed.
    Watson J
    Health Soc Serv J; 1984 Jun; 94(4901):708. PubMed ID: 10267770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. CEO evaluation practices.
    Petro P
    Osteopath Hosp Leadersh; 1985 Mar; 29(2):20-1. PubMed ID: 10272004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.