These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10250345)

  • 1. Performance appraisal: dilemmas and possibilities.
    Beer M
    Organ Dyn; 1981; 9(3):24-36. PubMed ID: 10250345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Personnel evaluation can solve many conflict situations].
    Vibjerg M; Rosenkvist S
    Sygeplejersken; 1980 Dec; 80(50):14-5. PubMed ID: 6908229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Current practices in performance appraisal.
    Wiehe VR
    Adm Soc Work; 1980; 4(3):1-11. PubMed ID: 10309378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonevaluative approaches to performance appraisals.
    Wallace L
    Superv Manage; 1978 Mar; 23(3):2-9. PubMed ID: 10307327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Appraisal scales that measure performance outcomes and job results.
    Plachy RJ
    Personnel; 1983; 60(3):57-65. PubMed ID: 10263512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How to handle problem staffers.
    Roseman E
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1998 Aug; 30(8):76-9, 99. PubMed ID: 10185549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Confronting problem performance: the art of preserving human resources.
    McKee DP
    Mich Hosp; 1981 Aug; 17(8):8-11. PubMed ID: 10252456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Separation isn't simple.
    Foegen JH
    Superv Manage; 1979 Sep; 24(9):12-5. PubMed ID: 10243409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Supervisor-subordinate similarity: types, effects, and mechanisms.
    Turban DB; Jones AP
    J Appl Psychol; 1988 May; 73(2):228-34. PubMed ID: 3384773
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Six steps to improve discussions of employee performance.
    Goodale JG
    Clin Lab Manage Rev; 1995; 9(1):7-8, 12-4. PubMed ID: 10139912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Capturing supervisor rating policies: a way to improve performance appraisal effectiveness.
    Hobson CJ; Gibson FW
    Pers Adm; 1984 Mar; 29(3):59-68. PubMed ID: 10265501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A supervisor asks: dealing with the negatives.
    Health Care Superv; 1988 Jan; 6(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 10285282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Developing a usable performance appraisal system.
    Brief AP
    J Nurs Adm; 1979 Oct; 9(10):7-10. PubMed ID: 258663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance appraisal: whose function?
    McAfee RB
    Pers J; 1981 Apr; 60(4):298-9. PubMed ID: 10250817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance appraisal blues: who should get the pink slip?
    Riordan J
    Respir Ther; 1981; 11(6):107-8, 110-11. PubMed ID: 10253943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reducing conflict in performance appraisal.
    Preston P
    Adm Radiol; 1991 Nov; 10(11):39-44. PubMed ID: 10115719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Developing performance-appraisal systems.
    Ross SR
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1984 Aug; 41(8):1567-73. PubMed ID: 6475976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Objective-focused approach for appraising the performance of institutional pharmacists.
    Coarse JF; Kubica AJ
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1979 Dec; 36(12):1676-82. PubMed ID: 525644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Employee performance reviews that work.
    Riley M
    J Nurs Adm; 1983 Oct; 13(10):32-3. PubMed ID: 6555223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. One important way to get the best performance from staff.
    Goldstein JM
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1999 Mar; 27(3):238-44. PubMed ID: 10634128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.