These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10250672)
21. New Jersey Supreme Court outlines standards for treatment withdrawal. Ahern ML Health Law Vigil; 1985 Feb; 8(4):4-6. PubMed ID: 10269746 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Ohio Probate Court authorized termination of treatment--follows precedent in Eichner. Schwartz RL Health Law Vigil; 1981 Mar; 4(5):12. PubMed ID: 10250134 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Washington Supreme Court decides case re: removal of life support systems. Ahern ML Health Law Vigil; 1985 Jan; 8(2):11-2. PubMed ID: 10269741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Termination of medical treatment. Horan DJ Forum; 1981; 16(3):470-87. PubMed ID: 11662910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Euthanasia questions stir new debate. Med World News; 1973 Sep; 14():73-78+. PubMed ID: 11662931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A matter of life and death: pregnancy clauses in living will statutes. Dyke MC Boston Univ Law Rev; 1990 Nov; 70(5):867-87. PubMed ID: 12186075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. "Pulling the plug": are you ready to make the decision? Ginsburg WH Physicians Manage; 1985 Mar; 25(3):349-51, 354, 357-60 passim. PubMed ID: 10270469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. When vitalism is dead wrong: the discrimination against and torture of incompetent patients by compulsory life-sustaining treatment. Ouellette AR Indiana Law J; 2004; 79(1):1-55. PubMed ID: 16189901 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Living wills: personal and professional perspectives. Death at a New York hospital. Law Med Health Care; 1985 Dec; 13(6):260-82. PubMed ID: 3854892 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. In re living will. Havens SL Nova Law J; 1981; 5(3):445-70. PubMed ID: 11649552 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. The legal and moral aspects of termination of life-support systems: a discussion. Loeffelholz JP; Madden MC; Morgan WK; Tooley WH Respir Care; 1977 Oct; 22(10):1146-56. PubMed ID: 10314821 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. For terminating treatment MDs face unprecedented murder charge. Breo DL; Lefton D; Rust ME Am Med News; 1983 Sep; 26(34):1, 13-9, 21-2. PubMed ID: 10262625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Euthanasia and the law. Campbell T Alta Law Rev; 1979; 17(2):188-209. PubMed ID: 11662771 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. In re Quinlan: a synthesis of law and medical technology. Hyland WF; Baime DS Rutgers Camden Law J; 1976; 8(1):37-64. PubMed ID: 11663167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Dutch doctors support life termination in dementia. Hellema H BMJ; 1993 May; 306(6889):1364. PubMed ID: 11643134 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The living will: the final expression. Baker CH Leg Med Q; 1980; 4():2-13. PubMed ID: 10251133 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Physician willingness to withhold tube feeding after Cruzan: an empirical study. Peters PG; Ely JW; Zweig SC; Elder NC; Schneider FD Miss Law Rev; 1992; 57():831-48. PubMed ID: 11654076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Bioethics in the courts: summaries of selected judicial decisions, 1989 to 1995. Nelson LJ Clin Ethics Rep; 1995; 9(1-2):1-20. PubMed ID: 11653201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Live or let die; who decides an incompetent's fate? In re Storar and In re Eichner. Bates KW Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1982; 1982(2):387-400. PubMed ID: 11655681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]