These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10251161)

  • 21. Appraising and paying for performance: another look at an age-old problem.
    Kennedy PW; Dresser SG
    Empl Benefits J; 2001 Dec; 26(4):8-14. PubMed ID: 11817071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Performance feedback as viewed by Dental Assistants: Part II.
    Dunning DG; Durham TM; McDonough D
    Dent Assist; 2012; 81(6):6-8. PubMed ID: 23304850
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Do you feel a merit system of granting pay raises is feasible or desirable in today's economy and labor movement atmosphere?
    Hosp Forum; 1976 Jan; 18(10):26. PubMed ID: 10242007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Designing an appraisal system that is fair and accurate.
    McMaster JB
    Pers J; 1979 Jan; 58(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 10239890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Developing performance criteria for merit pay: one school's process.
    Jenkins HM; Dienemann JA; Boland ML
    J Prof Nurs; 1988; 4(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 3397449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Chart auditing.
    Rowe RM
    Emerg Med Serv; 1983; 12(3):90-2. PubMed ID: 10260780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. An under-met and over-met expectations model of employee reactions to merit raises.
    Schaubroeck J; Shaw JD; Duffy MK; Mitra A
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 Mar; 93(2):424-34. PubMed ID: 18361641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The "refined" performance evaluation monitoring system: best of both worlds.
    Schick ME
    Pers J; 1980 Jan; 59(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 10245041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Rating managers' performance.
    Noll HE
    Multis; 1983 Mar; 1(1):34, 38-41. PubMed ID: 10258842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Salary programs have merit.
    Kinmon GH
    Med Group Manage; 1985; 32(6):34-6, 42. PubMed ID: 10274248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Pay-for-performance.
    Hosp Food Nutr Focus; 1990 Apr; 6(8):4-7. PubMed ID: 10104227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Developing valid employee appraisal systems.
    Thompson K; Wesley AM
    Health Serv Manager; 1980 Apr; 13(4):5-7, 10. PubMed ID: 10246700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Developing the performance appraisal system.
    Pelle D; Greenhalgh L
    Nurs Manage; 1987 Dec; 18(12):37-40, 42, 44. PubMed ID: 3696616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The hiring process.
    McCaleb TB
    Med Group Manage; 1980; 27(2):40-6. PubMed ID: 10245947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. How formal appraisal systems work.
    Pucilo NP
    Respir Ther; 1984; 14(2):37-43. PubMed ID: 10265552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Improve performance by appraisal.
    Waldman DA; Kenett RS
    HRMAGAZINE; 1990 Jul; 35(7):66-9. PubMed ID: 10105423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Why have an employee rating system?
    Gahagan DC
    Radiol Manage; 1981 Jun; 3(3):2-6. PubMed ID: 10252073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Survey reveals dentists' top worries.
    McKenzie S
    Dent Today; 2006 Jul; 25(7):126, 128-9. PubMed ID: 16884086
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Merit pay as a motivational tool in healthcare.
    Wagner RG
    Hosp Top; 1988; 66(6):10-5. PubMed ID: 10291777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Self evaluation: what nurses say].
    Lévesque-Barbès H
    Nurs Que; 1987; 7(6):70-3. PubMed ID: 3684066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.