252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10252073)
1. Why have an employee rating system?
Gahagan DC
Radiol Manage; 1981 Jun; 3(3):2-6. PubMed ID: 10252073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A practical approach to performance appraisal.
Pressler EC
Manage World; 1978 Nov; 7(11):9-12. PubMed ID: 10239456
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Policy and procedure manual. Employee anecdotal record.
Curr Concepts Hosp Pharm Manage; 1987; 9(3):17-8. PubMed ID: 10284117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance appraisals can improve efficiency.
Korneluk G
Can Doct; 1982 Sep; 48(9):61-4. PubMed ID: 10257835
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Self appraisal.
Schlossberg A
Nurs Homes; 1981; 30(1):2-9. PubMed ID: 10283804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance appraisal: one company's experience.
Birch WJ
Pers J; 1981 Jun; 60(6):456-60. PubMed ID: 10251600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating employee performance: contemporary trends for the administrator.
Smith HL; Elbert NF
J Am Health Care Assoc; 1979 Mar; 5(2):10-1, 13-6. PubMed ID: 10308826
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A three-part performance appraisal system.
Khan MK
Can J Med Technol; 1982 Jun; 44(2):93-5. PubMed ID: 10256198
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Capturing supervisor rating policies: a way to improve performance appraisal effectiveness.
Hobson CJ; Gibson FW
Pers Adm; 1984 Mar; 29(3):59-68. PubMed ID: 10265501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. To troubleshoot your appraisal system, check users first -- then forms.
Phifer SH
Training; 1981 Sep; 18(9):140. PubMed ID: 10255010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Increasing performance appraisal effectiveness: matching task types, appraisal process, and rater training.
Lee C
Acad Manage Rev; 1985 Apr; 10(2):322-31. PubMed ID: 10271248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An employee performance appraisal program.
van Dassen D
Dimens Health Serv; 1979 Dec; 56(12):36-9. PubMed ID: 510827
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Combing BARS and MBO6: using an appraisal system to diagnose performance problems.
Schneier CE; Beatty RW
Pers Adm; 1979 Sep; 24(9):51-60. PubMed ID: 10243666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A critique of performance appraisal systems.
Yager E
Pers J; 1981 Feb; 60(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 10249832
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Developing and implementing a Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale System: the Brook Lane Psychiatric Center experience.
Kolva CO
Nurse Managers Bookshelf; 1989 Jun; 1(2):49-59. PubMed ID: 2640602
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Developing behaviorally-anchored rating scales (BARS).
Schneier CE; Beatty RW
Pers Adm; 1979 Aug; 24(8):59-68. PubMed ID: 10243308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Designing an appraisal system that is fair and accurate.
McMaster JB
Pers J; 1979 Jan; 58(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 10239890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The performance appraisal interview: putting it all together.
Simpson DB
Health Care Superv; 1985 Jan; 3(2):63-76. PubMed ID: 10270649
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving performance appraisal from the bottom up.
McConnell CR
Health Care Superv; 1990 Jan; 8(2):73-83. PubMed ID: 10103370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Toward a comprehensive personnel system: performance appraisal--Part IV.
Nauright L
Nurs Manage; 1987 Aug; 18(8):67-70, 75-7. PubMed ID: 3649657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
