These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10253107)

  • 1. Federal court refuses to honor state statutory privilege for proceedings of medical staff credentials committee.
    Schwartz RL
    Health Law Vigil; 1981 Nov; 4(23):4-5. PubMed ID: 10253107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wyoming court interprets state peer review shield law.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1989 May; 6(7):7-8. PubMed ID: 10294155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comment: Peer review privilege established by Illinois Medical Studies Act does not extend to investigations undertaken by hospital administrations.
    Mustes JJ; Popovits RM
    J Health Hosp Law; 1988 Aug; 21(8):191-4. PubMed ID: 10288421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Important hospital confidentiality interests are strengthened through Illinois court's denial of staff privileges material discovery in malpractice action.
    O'Brien JP
    Health Law Vigil; 1982 Feb; 5(4):5-6. PubMed ID: 10254162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. NY Court refuses to review medical privileges.
    Regan WA
    Hosp Prog; 1980 Aug; 61(8):72, 74. PubMed ID: 10247579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. New inroads into confidentiality.
    Chenen AR
    Med Econ; 1982 Aug; 59(17):88-90, 95, 98. PubMed ID: 10257960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medical staff records exempt from discovery.
    Regan WA
    Hosp Prog; 1982 Apr; 63(4):72-3. PubMed ID: 10254841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Credentials committee.
    George JE
    J Med Soc N J; 1983 Oct; 80(10):802. PubMed ID: 6580451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Federal court limits federal antitrust jurisdiction over medical staff decisions.
    Christensen JD
    Health Law Vigil; 1984 Jan; 7(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 10264312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The case of the non-curious members of the credentials committee.
    Rasinski D
    Internist; 1984 Jul; 25(6):27. PubMed ID: 10267885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Where doctors can't confront peers who accuse them.
    Harsham P
    Med Econ; 1985 Sep; 62(18):96-8, 102-6. PubMed ID: 10272848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Federal district court dismisses alleged antitrust and civil rights violations in Florida hospitals' denial of staff privileges.
    O'Brien JP
    Health Law Vigil; 1981 Sep; 4(19):10-1. PubMed ID: 10252310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Confidentiality of peer review records.
    IMJ Ill Med J; 1984 Dec; 166(6):409. PubMed ID: 6150918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Law guards M.D.'s privacy, but gives board access to psychiatric records.
    Horty JF
    Mod Healthc; 1982 Sep; 12(9):102. PubMed ID: 10256752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CA appellate court reaffirms statutory prohibition against discovery of medical staff proceedings and records.
    Kadzielski MA
    Health Law Vigil; 1984 Apr; 7(8):6. PubMed ID: 10265829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Medical staff privileges: is antitrust a real issue for providers?
    Enders RJ
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1986 Mar; 40(3):64-70. PubMed ID: 10275454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Court upholds rational approach to granting medical staff privileges.
    Kadzielski MA
    Health Prog; 1987 Mar; 68(2):14. PubMed ID: 10280966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Court affirms hospital boards' right to revoke medical staff privileges.
    Horty JF
    Mod Healthc; 1984 May; 14(6):116-7. PubMed ID: 10266673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Missouri appeals court overturns public hospital board decision on suspension of staff privileges to a medical staff member.
    Sill GM
    Health Law Vigil; 1984 Feb; 7(4):2-3. PubMed ID: 10264700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A legal criteria for medical staff privilege renewals.
    Rozovsky LE; Rozovsky FA
    Health Care (Don Mills); 1985 Jun; 27(5):28-9. PubMed ID: 10271861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.