These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10253232)

  • 1. High Court debate: does healthcare deserve special antitrust review?
    Proger PA
    Mod Healthc; 1981 Nov; 11(11):120, 122. PubMed ID: 10253232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Arizona v. Maricopa County: a stern antitrust warning to healthcare providers.
    Halper HR
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1982 Oct; 36(10):38-42. PubMed ID: 10315212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. U.S. Supreme Court rejects case-by-case antitrust analysis in Maricopa.
    McCann RW
    Health Law Vigil; 1982 Jun; 5(13):1-4. PubMed ID: 10256005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Court decisions expand industry's antitrust exposure.
    Waxman JM
    Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1982; 15(5):52-3. PubMed ID: 10256503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Court decisions give Blues plans one win, one loss in separate antitrust cases.
    Halper HR; Kazon PM
    Bus Health; 1987 Mar; 4(5):51-2. PubMed ID: 10280673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. U.S. District Court finds Blue Shield physician payment method violates Sec. 1 of the Sherman Act.
    Laurence K; Kinney ED
    Health Law Vigil; 1984 Mar; 7(7):4-7. PubMed ID: 10278231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Antitrust law and collective physician negotiations with third parties: the relative value guide object lesson.
    Pfizenmayer RF
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1982; 7(1):128-62. PubMed ID: 7108165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Supreme Court, antitrust and the health care field.
    Health Law Vigil; 1982 Oct; 5(22):1-14. PubMed ID: 10257142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. "Free choice" as a restraint of trade in American health care delivery and insurance.
    Weller CD
    Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1985 May; 7(3):5-46. PubMed ID: 10300085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An economic analysis of the Maricopa decision.
    Goldberg LG; Greenberg W
    Health Matrix; 1987; 5(2):26-30. PubMed ID: 10283416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Antitrust in the health services industry: the first five years.
    Dolan AK
    Health Med Care Serv Rev; 1981-1982; 3(2-3):13, 15-24. PubMed ID: 10299261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Are PPOs a competitive force or antitrust risk?
    Enders RJ
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1986 May; 40(5):52-60. PubMed ID: 10276171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bill would stop FTC probes of health care price fixing.
    McIntyre KJ
    Bus Insur; 1982 Jun; 16(26):2, 99. PubMed ID: 10255880
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Blue Shield's ban on balance billing found an "unreasonable restraint on competition".
    Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1984 Aug; 39(2):97-8. PubMed ID: 10278262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physicians and PPOs: antitrust lessons from Maricopa.
    Finke RF; Gary M
    Hosp Med Staff; 1983 Jul; 12(7):10-5. PubMed ID: 10278175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. PPOs and the antitrust laws.
    Stromberg RE; Duncheon MA; Goldman JS
    Hospitals; 1983 Oct; 57(20):65-70. PubMed ID: 6618473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vertical restraints and powerful health insurers: exclusionary conduct masquerading as managed care?
    Miller FH
    Law Contemp Probl; 1988; 51(2):195-236. PubMed ID: 10295963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The debate begins over physician payment.
    Robinson ML
    Healthspan; 1987 Apr; 4(4):26-33. PubMed ID: 10301523
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can Blue Shield offer data processing services to doctors, in competition with commercial data processing services?
    Morse HN
    Med Electron; 1985 Apr; 16(2):12. PubMed ID: 10271578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. States can't shield peer review from antitrust--high court.
    Burda D
    Mod Healthc; 1988 May; 18(21):5. PubMed ID: 10324515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.