These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10253814)

  • 1. Md federal district court interprets 1980 Equal Access to Justice Act Amendments; Act's utility to hospitals may be limited.
    O'Brien JP
    Health Law Vigil; 1982 Jan; 5(2):6-7. PubMed ID: 10253814
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Two federal district courts make the first awards of attorneys' fees under Equal Access to Justice Act.
    Picard DS; O'Brien JP
    Health Law Vigil; 1982 Mar; 5(6):6-7. PubMed ID: 10254513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What is the Recovery Act's dedicated Medicaid funding ultimately stimulating?
    Brooke K
    Healthc Financ Manage; 2009 Aug; 63(8):32-4. PubMed ID: 19658322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Amendment to DHEW Appropriation Act, 1977, concerning the use of federal funds for abortion.
    Packwood RW
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1976 Jun; 122(102):S10793-807. PubMed ID: 11663738
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Court places welfare responsibility ahead of Hill-Burton free-care rule.
    Horty JF
    Mod Healthc; 1983 Feb; 13(2):140-1. PubMed ID: 10258828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Supreme Court rules on access to contraception, abortion: states can deny Medicaid benefits, hospital services for elective abortions.
    Fam Plann Popul Rep; 1977 Aug; 6(4):41+. PubMed ID: 11663780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Constitutional law--state action--private hospitals receiving Hill-Burton funds do not act under color of state authority in denying access to their facilities for abortions.
    Roberts CC
    Georgetown Law J; 1974 Jul; 62(6):1783-93. PubMed ID: 11663482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 'Hyde decision denies equal health care access'.
    Branch De
    Ob Gyn News; 1980 Aug; 15(15):1+. PubMed ID: 11664010
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distinguishing government's responsibility in rationing public and private medical resources.
    Blumstein JF
    Tex Law Rev; 1982 May; 60(5):899-918. PubMed ID: 11650651
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time and money. Providers have issues with stimulus act's deadlines, definitions for IT.
    Conn J
    Mod Healthc; 2009 Jul; 39(27):14-5. PubMed ID: 19606666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does the state action doctrine compel nominally private hospitals to make abortion services available despite "conscience clauses".
    Shuger NB
    Md Law Forum; 1974; 4(3):113-24. PubMed ID: 11663479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reproductive freedom issues in legal services practice.
    Law S
    Clgh Rev; 1978 Nov; 12(7):389-403. PubMed ID: 11665039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The economics of abortion access in the US: restrictions on government funding for abortion is the post-Roe battleground.
    Fried MG
    Conscience; 2005-2006; 26(4):11-5. PubMed ID: 16619422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.
    Sayeed SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. HHS readies regulations to cut hospitals' obligations to the poor.
    Med World News; 1982 Sep; 23(18):24. PubMed ID: 11645478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hill-Burton hospitals after Roe and Doe: can federally funded hospitals refuse to perform abortions?
    Berl EL
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1974; 4(1):83-97. PubMed ID: 11663526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Section 401(b) of the Health Programs Extension Act: an abortive attempt by Congress to resolve a constitutional dilemma.
    William Mary Law Rev; 1975; 17(2):303-31. PubMed ID: 11663679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Americans with Disabilities Act and refusals to provide medical care to persons with HIV/AIDS.
    DeSario JP; Slack JD
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1994; 27(2):347-62. PubMed ID: 11654697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. State limitations upon the availability and accessibility of abortions after Wade and Bolton.
    Finn J
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 25(1):87-107. PubMed ID: 11663734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Supreme Court upholds constitutionality of Hyde Amendment.
    Garn J
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1980 Jun; 126(110):S8994-7. PubMed ID: 11664150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.