These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10253928)
21. Laboratory costs and utilization: guidelines for efficient use of laboratory technology. Lehmann CA; Leiken AM Health Care Strateg Manage; 1985 Apr; 3(4):8-11. PubMed ID: 10270964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A system of workload measurement for clinical dietitians. Towers D; Coskumer H; Kennedy M; Brunet MK; Kack M J Can Diet Assoc; 1987; 48(4):243-6. PubMed ID: 10284974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Turnaround time. Part II. How labs improve their performance. Hallam K MLO Med Lab Obs; 1988 Aug; 20(8):39-41, 44-6. PubMed ID: 10288721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Interlaboratory surveys to assess performance: more than proficiency testing. Hassemer DJ MLO Med Lab Obs; 2006 Jan; 38(1):20-1, 24-5. PubMed ID: 16493906 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Turnaround time. Part I: Speeding up, but is it fast enough? Hallam K MLO Med Lab Obs; 1988 Aug; 20(8):28-31, 34. PubMed ID: 10288720 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Creating an anatomic pathology laboratory--examining the time line. Luck JB; Mortland KK; Mortland DB Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2002; 16(6):441-4. PubMed ID: 12506841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Setting up a laboratory for therapeutic drug monitoring. Kalman SM Hosp Formul; 1982 Apr; 17(4):568-70, 573. PubMed ID: 10317192 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Selecting laboratory instrumentation. Part I. De Cresce RP; Lifshitz MS MLO Med Lab Obs; 1989 Feb; 21(2):76-9, 82-3. PubMed ID: 10303314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An alternative method for measuring workload. Part II. Lindner CA; Helms AS; Shaw BW MLO Med Lab Obs; 1986 Jun; 18(6):61-6. PubMed ID: 10277683 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Surgeon workload and motion efficiency with robot and human laparoscopic camera control. Kondraske GV; Hamilton EC; Scott DJ; Fischer CA; Tesfay ST; Taneja R; Brown RJ; Jones DB Surg Endosc; 2002 Nov; 16(11):1523-7. PubMed ID: 12098023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Workflow analysis, a tool for laboratorians. Case study: a drug-testing laboratory. Lehmann C; Leiken A; Branchflower R Am Clin Lab; 1994 May; 13(5):12-3. PubMed ID: 10147161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Time study of clinical and nonclinical workload in pathology and laboratory medicine. Trotter MJ; Larsen ET; Tait N; Wright JR Am J Clin Pathol; 2009 Jun; 131(6):759-67. PubMed ID: 19461078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A collaborative approach to lean laboratory workstation design reduces wasted technologist travel. Yerian LM; Seestadt JA; Gomez ER; Marchant KK Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Aug; 138(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 22904140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A creative combination: why commercial and hospital laboratories should unite. Peter JB Pathologist; 1984 Nov; 38(11):708-10. PubMed ID: 10268809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Community (home) nurse workload monitoring. Sartain B Health Serv Manpow Rev; 1977 Nov; 3(4):21-3. PubMed ID: 10305075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Graphic analysis of pharmacy workload as a management tool. Hanna KJ Hosp Pharm; 1983 Jun; 18(6):299-301, 304. PubMed ID: 10278167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]