257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10253966)
1. The development and use of a computerized cancer data system.
Murray C; Wallace J
Top Health Rec Manage; 1981 Dec; 2(2):63-73. PubMed ID: 10253966
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The hospital cancer program: its benefit to patients.
Fleming ID; Sumner S
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1980 Sep; 65(9):10-3. PubMed ID: 10248272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The importance of multi hospital linkages for oncological cancer control services to the rural hospital: an administrative perspective.
Levine PA; Berker I
Prog Clin Biol Res; 1987; 248():229-32. PubMed ID: 3671411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Uses of tumor-registry data in program planning and administration.
Sakulsky SB; Feingold M
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1983 Sep; 68(9):19-21. PubMed ID: 10262057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Cancer: guidelines for the eighties. The role of the field liaison program.
Jones RC
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1980 Sep; 65(9):18-9. PubMed ID: 10248275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Hospital expands outpatient center, plans satellite.
Dougherty E
Health Care Strateg Manage; 1989 Feb; 7(2):21-2. PubMed ID: 10291749
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A group practice cancer treatment network is born.
Anderson D; Ingle JN; Moertel CG
Group Pract; 1979; 28(2):12-5, 32. PubMed ID: 10240833
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Oregon physicians join forces for cancer control.
Christmyer M
Forum Med; 1978 Jun; 1(3):14, 16, 18-9. PubMed ID: 10307477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comprehensive cancer centres in The Netherlands.
Cleton FJ
Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1989; 59(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 2923524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cancer: guidelines for the eighties. Goals for a new decade.
McKenna RJ
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1980 Sep; 65(9):5-7. PubMed ID: 10248280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Organization of cancer care in Slovakia.
Ujhazy V; Koza I
Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1989; 59(2):149-51. PubMed ID: 2719534
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Organization of cancer care in France.
Lagarde C
Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1989; 59(4):299-300. PubMed ID: 2802937
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Organization of cancer care in the German Democratic Republic.
Tanneberger S
Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1989; 59(1):69-72. PubMed ID: 2923525
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [The programmable microcalculator in the organization of an oncology service].
Filatov VN
Vopr Onkol; 1986; 32(4):85-94. PubMed ID: 3754672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comprehensive cancer centres in the Federal Republic of Germany.
Schmidt CG
Arch Geschwulstforsch; 1989; 59(2):153-5. PubMed ID: 2719535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The development and validation of an oncology patient classification system.
Arenth LM
Oncol Nurs Forum; 1985; 12(6):17-22. PubMed ID: 3851447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The human element in computer-generated patient management plans.
McColligan EE; Blum BI; Lenhard RE; Johnson MB
J Clin Comput; 1981; 9(6):175-91. PubMed ID: 10253184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Cancer--a product approach.
Sinioris M
Health Care Strateg Manage; 1986 Oct; 4(10):26-9. PubMed ID: 10301256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Improving surgical services for cancer patients].
Chissov VI; Gritsman IuIa; Mamontov AS
Sov Med; 1983; (12):3-6. PubMed ID: 6231731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Soothing the worried well.
Stephens B
Profiles Healthc Mark; 1990 Jan; (37):25-9. PubMed ID: 10103455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
