These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10254024)

  • 1. How the courts view medical records.
    Hirsh HL
    Am Coll Physicians Obs; 1981 Jun; 1(6):4-5. PubMed ID: 10254024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medical malpractice matters: medical record M & Ms.
    Lyons JM; Martinez JA; O'Leary JP
    J Surg Educ; 2009; 66(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 19486876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Documentation revisited.
    QRC Advis; 1989 Nov; 6(1):1, 8. PubMed ID: 10324701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Patient-care documentation.
    Anderson CW
    Emerg Med Serv; 1999 Mar; 28(3):59-62. PubMed ID: 10346609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ways to upgrade review of medical records.
    Schneider JF
    QA Rev; 1989 Dec; 1(5):8. PubMed ID: 10313504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Medical record review.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 1987; 7(9-10):8-10. PubMed ID: 10289804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Documentation: burden or blessing?
    Gutheil TG
    J Am Assoc Med Transcr; 1994; 13(2):39. PubMed ID: 10134754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Malpractice risks of documentation.
    Battista ME
    Physicians Manage; 1985 Feb; 25(2):232-4, 238-9, 242 passim. PubMed ID: 10269895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does your documentation satisfy irate colleagues?
    ED Manag; 2002 Jun; 14(6):68-9, suppl 1-2. PubMed ID: 12046238
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Requiring physicians to complete medical records.
    Roach WH; King PD
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1982 Sep; 3(1):84-9. PubMed ID: 10256855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aim for excellence in medical records approach.
    Skillicorn SA
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1982 Jul; 7(7):86-8. PubMed ID: 10257438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using peer review for self-audits of medical record documentation.
    Bradshaw RW
    Fam Pract Manag; 2000 Apr; 7(4):28-32. PubMed ID: 10947679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Executive message. Medical record usage has never been higher.
    Finnegan R
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1989 Aug; 60(8):12-3. PubMed ID: 10294626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Medical record review for clinical pertinence.
    Schraffenberger LA
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1989 May; 60(5):43-50. PubMed ID: 10292964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Avoiding unnecessary peer review.
    Nelson KM
    QA Rev; 1991; 3(3):1, 8. PubMed ID: 10115142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How your charts could jeopardize your license.
    Demos MP
    Med Econ; 1994 Dec; 71(23):95-6, 98, 100-2. PubMed ID: 10138872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Think how records might be used before discarding.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2003 Feb; 28(2):22-3. PubMed ID: 12647577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Guidelines for charting: documentation of medications and i.v.s. Prepared by the Professional Liability Program, Farmers Insurance Group of Companies.
    QRC Advis; 1990 Oct; 6(12):1, 5. PubMed ID: 10106990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Documentation errors are easy to avoid and correct.
    Hosp Case Manag; 2003 Sep; 11(9):140-2. PubMed ID: 12931506
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical pertinence review.
    QRC Advis; 1989 Nov; 6(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 10295774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.