These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10254162)
1. Important hospital confidentiality interests are strengthened through Illinois court's denial of staff privileges material discovery in malpractice action. O'Brien JP Health Law Vigil; 1982 Feb; 5(4):5-6. PubMed ID: 10254162 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical staff records exempt from discovery. Regan WA Hosp Prog; 1982 Apr; 63(4):72-3. PubMed ID: 10254841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comment: Peer review privilege established by Illinois Medical Studies Act does not extend to investigations undertaken by hospital administrations. Mustes JJ; Popovits RM J Health Hosp Law; 1988 Aug; 21(8):191-4. PubMed ID: 10288421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. New inroads into confidentiality. Chenen AR Med Econ; 1982 Aug; 59(17):88-90, 95, 98. PubMed ID: 10257960 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Confidentiality of peer review records. IMJ Ill Med J; 1984 Dec; 166(6):409. PubMed ID: 6150918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Courts beginning to address confidentiality of physicians' credentialing records. Dawson JS Healthspan; 1994 Jun; 11(6):3-5. PubMed ID: 10135152 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Divulging hospital records: need for access vs. confidentiality. Bernstein AH Hospitals; 1979 Apr; 53(7):51, 54, 58. PubMed ID: 761887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Federal court refuses to honor state statutory privilege for proceedings of medical staff credentials committee. Schwartz RL Health Law Vigil; 1981 Nov; 4(23):4-5. PubMed ID: 10253107 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Law guards M.D.'s privacy, but gives board access to psychiatric records. Horty JF Mod Healthc; 1982 Sep; 12(9):102. PubMed ID: 10256752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Supreme Court's VGH ruling looms, but so may other manpower battles. LeBourdais E CMAJ; 1990 Feb; 142(3):248-50. PubMed ID: 2302619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Where doctors can't confront peers who accuse them. Harsham P Med Econ; 1985 Sep; 62(18):96-8, 102-6. PubMed ID: 10272848 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. High court's override on Patrick renews concerns about peer review risk. Halper HR; Kazon PM Bus Health; 1988 Jul; 5(9):40-1. PubMed ID: 10288490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Apparent agency: estoppel/detrimental reliance/proximate cause--an evolution from case law to statute. Ferraro DA J Health Hosp Law; 1996; 29(1):38-42, 48. PubMed ID: 10160172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The peer review privilege: a dying cause? McKinney P J Health Hosp Law; 1992 Jul; 25(7):201-11, 215. PubMed ID: 10123592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medical malpractice litigation: the discoverability and use of hospitals' quality assurance committee records. Holbrook RF; Dunn LJ Med Malpract Cost Containment J; 1979 Jul; 1(2):109-31. PubMed ID: 10243995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]