106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1025449)
1. [Outfit for impedance studies of the auditory function].
Butenko LN; Moroz BS; Barazarov VG
Med Tekh; 1976; 0(3):43-4. PubMed ID: 1025449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hearing function in a hyperbaric environment.
Mendel LL; Knafelc ME; Cudahy EA
Undersea Hyperb Med; 2000; 27(2):91-105. PubMed ID: 11011799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Acoustic impedance in audiology].
Gersdorff M
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1980; 34 Suppl():1-139. PubMed ID: 7010894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Method and diagnostic importance of recording dynamic indicator of acoustic impedance of the middle ear - tympanometry].
Sagalovich BM; Drozdov AA; Tsukanova VN
Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1976; (3):24-9. PubMed ID: 960430
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Age-related characteristics of dynamic indicators of acoustic impedance of the middle ear in children].
Sagalovich BM; Shimanskaia EI
Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1992; (3):9-13. PubMed ID: 1523778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantification of the threshold and latency parameters of the acoustic reflex in humans.
McPherson DL; Thompson D
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1978; 353():1-37. PubMed ID: 278462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of positive and negative middle ear pressures on auditory threshold.
Petrova P; Freeman S; Sohmer H
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):734-8. PubMed ID: 16819311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Device for measuring the acoustic impedance of the middle ear].
Gintsburg BG; Uspenskiĭ VV; Lopotko AI; Ryndin PP; Solopchenko IuA
Med Tekh; 1975; (5):33-6. PubMed ID: 1214573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Variations in acoustic admittance related to type of ear tip. A plea for a standardized method.
Himelfarb MZ; Rapoport Y; Shanon E
Isr J Med Sci; 1976 Nov; 12(11):1289-93. PubMed ID: 1017930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The application of acoustic impedance measurements to pediatric clinical practice.
Ehrlich MA; Tait CA
Pediatrics; 1975 May; 55(5):666-72. PubMed ID: 1128990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Auditory steady-state response audiometry in profound SNHL: the impact of abnormal middle ear function.
Tonini R; Ballay C; Manolidis S
Ear Nose Throat J; 2005 May; 84(5):282, 284-6, 288. PubMed ID: 15971750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Verification of impedance measurements by a volumetric and electromechanical model.
Eliachar I; Danino Y; Braun S; Meged D; Joachims H; Frank A
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1983; 17():21-6. PubMed ID: 6577553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The clinical application of impedance audiometry. A preliminary appraisal of an electro-acoustic impedance bridge.
Alberti PW; Kristensen R
Laryngoscope; 1970 May; 80(5):735-46. PubMed ID: 5452512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Hearing sensitivity and measurements of middle ear and eustachian tube function after maxillary osteotomy with advancement surgery.
DeRuyter F; Diefendorf AO
J Oral Surg; 1980 May; 38(5):343-7. PubMed ID: 6928932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Biomechanics of the middle ear].
Dancer A; Franke R
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1995; 116(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 7644847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Peripheral audition of children on the autistic spectrum.
Gravel JS; Dunn M; Lee WW; Ellis MA
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):299-312. PubMed ID: 16672798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Audiometry-impedance measurement].
Tronche R
Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1977; 94(4-5):193-5. PubMed ID: 900744
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Distortion product otoacoustic emissions and tympanometric measurements in an adult population-based study.
Uchida Y; Ando F; Nakata S; Ueda H; Nakashima T; Niino N; Shimokata H
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2006 Dec; 33(4):397-401. PubMed ID: 16753276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Susceptance and conductance changes in acoustic reflexometry.
Cunningham DR; Porter TA
J Am Audiol Soc; 1975; 1(3):131-4. PubMed ID: 1228165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of stimulus duration and stimulus off time on the auditory and acoustic reflex thresholds.
Feldman AS; Katz D
J Speech Hear Res; 1978 Mar; 21(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 642490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
