94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10255472)
1. Evaluation of double contrast barium enemas performed by radiographic technologists.
Somers S; Stevenson GW; Laufer I; Gledhill L; Nugent J
Can J Radiogr Radiother Nucl Med; 1982; 13(3):110-1. PubMed ID: 10255472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of radiologists and technologists in the performance of air-contrast barium enemas.
Thompson WM; Foster WL; Paulson EK; Niedzwiecki D; Low VH; Fulford LB; Broomer BW; Sanders L; Rockey DC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Sep; 187(3):706-9. PubMed ID: 16928934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of double contrast barium enemas performed by radiographic technologists.
Somers S; Stevenson GW; Laufer I; Gledhill L; Nugent J
J Can Assoc Radiol; 1981 Dec; 32(4):227-8. PubMed ID: 7328102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A disposable barium and air rectal tip.
Kornblum D; Zimmerman K
Radiol Technol; 1976; 47(4):261-2. PubMed ID: 1246578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How to build the perfect technologist. Licensure of nuclear medicine technologists and sonographers.
Tsuchiyama S
Adm Radiol; 1990 Dec; 9(12):44-5, 47-51. PubMed ID: 10109203
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Technical adequacy of fluoroscopic spot films of the gastrointestinal tract: comparison of residents and technologists.
Schreiber MH; vanSonnenberg E; Wittich GR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):795-7. PubMed ID: 8610552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Graduate technologists and customer service: a 1991 survey.
Callaway WJ
Radiol Manage; 1992; 14(2):50-5. PubMed ID: 10119018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Is the preparation of barium enema a sound preparation for echography?].
Scherrer A; Menu Y
J Radiol; 1983 Nov; 64(11):649-50. PubMed ID: 6663563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Complications from radiographer-performed double contrast barium enemas.
Vora P; Chapman A
Clin Radiol; 2004 Apr; 59(4):364-8. PubMed ID: 15041457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of barium enemas performed by radiographers.
Brown L; Desai S
Clin Radiol; 2002 Feb; 57(2):129-31. PubMed ID: 11977946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Should technologists perform barium enemas?
Stevenson G
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2000 Apr; 51(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 10786914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Technologists competent to perform basic GI exams.
Krotz D
Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Jul; 21(7):25-7. PubMed ID: 10539700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Best practice in barium enemas.
Conteh AK; Henwood S
Nurs Times; 2000 Jun 1-7; 96(22):34-5. PubMed ID: 11962794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A re-audit of examination dose and screening time of radiographer-performed barium enemas.
Robertson MA; Bleakney RR; Duncan KA
Clin Radiol; 2000 Jun; 55(6):492. PubMed ID: 10873702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Is there still a role for double-contrast barium enema examination?
Canon CL
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Apr; 6(4):389-92. PubMed ID: 18321788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dilute barium as a contrast agent for abdominal CT.
Megibow AJ; Bosniak MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1980 Jun; 134(6):1273-4. PubMed ID: 6770647
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Barium enema and endoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia: sensitivity, specificity, complications and its determinants.
de Zwart IM; Griffioen G; Shaw MP; Lamers CB; de Roos A
Clin Radiol; 2001 May; 56(5):401-9. PubMed ID: 11384140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Principles of performance and interpretation of double-contrast gastrointestinal studies.
Evers K; Kressel HY
Radiol Clin North Am; 1982 Dec; 20(4):667-85. PubMed ID: 6758030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy.
Spinzi G; Minoli G
Gastrointest Endosc; 2001 Sep; 54(3):417-8. PubMed ID: 11550672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema.
Glick SN
N Engl J Med; 2000 Dec; 343(23):1728; author reply 1729-30. PubMed ID: 11185429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
