211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10255487)
1. EMS communications funding.
Beaman WW
Emerg Med Serv; 1982; 11(2):46, 48. PubMed ID: 10255487
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Telemedicine. The key to expanded EMS or an expensive experiment?
Garza MA
JEMS; 1998 Dec; 23(12):28-30, 32, 34-8. PubMed ID: 10339245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Benchmarking emergency medical services/trauma systems funding in the United States.
Goodspeed DG
Best Pract Benchmarking Healthc; 1997; 2(2):45-51. PubMed ID: 9214865
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. DRGs spur sales of emergency alert units.
Wilkinson R
Hospitals; 1986 Mar; 60(6):97, 99. PubMed ID: 2936668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. How to save money on your radio purchases.
Montville D
Emerg Med Serv; 1983; 12(3):58, 60. PubMed ID: 10260777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The homeland security communications mistake.
Ott WE
JEMS; 2003 Oct; 28(10):90-1. PubMed ID: 14583707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Managing the aftermath of rapid EMS growth: what happens when the federal funds dry up?
Newkirk W
Emerg Med Serv; 1980; 9(6):123-6. PubMed ID: 10248877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. RTSS--a closer look at a cost-cutting concept, Part I.
Thomas TL
Emerg Med Serv; 1982; 11(3):97-9. PubMed ID: 10255498
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Readers' perspective. Government funding of information technology tools for first responders needs to be a higher priority. Do you agree or disagree?
Powers P; Llewellyn A; Greene C; Natarajan P
Health Data Manag; 2007 Jun; 15(6):8. PubMed ID: 17580786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. RTSS--a closer look at a cost-cutting concept, Part II.
Thomas TL
Emerg Med Serv; 1982; 11(4):88-90. PubMed ID: 10258560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Emergency medical services for children: the report from the Institute of Medicine.
Weinberg JA; Medearis DN
Pediatrics; 1994 May; 93(5):821-3. PubMed ID: 8165087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Keeping in touch with the elderly: Lifeline.
Volunt Leader; 1984; 25(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 10272959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Gilmore Commission calls for funding & federal EMS office.
Lindstrom AM
JEMS; 2004 Apr; 29(4):138. PubMed ID: 15067618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Procuring communications equipment: the bid process and selection of a vendor.
Flynn DR
Emerg Health Serv Q; 1981; 1(2):24-34. PubMed ID: 10256488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A comprehensive framework for determining the cost of an emergency medical services system.
Lerner EB; Nichol G; Spaite DW; Garrison HG; Maio RF
Ann Emerg Med; 2007 Mar; 49(3):304-13. PubMed ID: 17113682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Healthcare's new challenge: expecting the unexpected.
Witt JL
Front Health Serv Manage; 2002; 19(1):31-3; discussion 45-6. PubMed ID: 12355632
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The probable impact of federal budget cuts on emergency medical services.
Aprahamian C
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1982 Oct; 67(10):10-1. PubMed ID: 10256889
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Year of advancement: 2012 to bring federal EMS lead agency & discharge data to EMS.
Heightman AJ
JEMS; 2012 Jan; 37(1):14. PubMed ID: 22269681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Emergency medical services in Connecticut.
Van Gelder CM; Frantz R; Bogucki S
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2005; 9(2):219-26. PubMed ID: 16036850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tele-collaboration in EMS communications: new concepts & technology challenge EMS systems to think outside the box for communications.
Bashford C; Veenema M
JEMS; 2002 Oct; 27(10):82-6. PubMed ID: 12368769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
