These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
90 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10255846)
1. The 'squeal rule': government and confidentiality. Prout DM Am Coll Physicians Obs; 1982 Apr; 2(3):3, 8. PubMed ID: 10255846 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The "squeal rule" and a minor's right to privacy. Olah PA Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1985 Jun; 7(4):5-37. PubMed ID: 10271679 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. 'Squeal rule' may be first Heckler test. Fox JE US Med; 1983 Feb; 19(3):1, 38-9. PubMed ID: 10259328 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Teens left with many options despite 'squeal rule'. Ob Gyn News; 1983 Jul 1-14; 18(13):36. PubMed ID: 11658369 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Unemancipated minors' rights of access to contraceptives without parental consent or notice--the squeal rule and beyond. Best M Oklahoma City Univ Law Rev; 1983; 8(2):219-50. PubMed ID: 11658756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Reagan administration decides not to appeal "squeal rule" defeat. Ob Gyn News; 1984 Feb 1-14; 19(3):3, 36. PubMed ID: 11653544 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. H.L. v. Matheson and the right of minors to seek abortions. Wolff MH; Hawn RH Calif West Law Rev; 1982; 19(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658632 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Limiting confidentiality of adolescent health services: what are the risks? Ford CA; English A JAMA; 2002 Aug; 288(6):752-3. PubMed ID: 12169082 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The minor's limited right to confidential health care and the inverse of confidentiality: a parent's decision not to disclose illness status to a minor child. van Straaten J Child Leg Rights J; 2000; 20(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 16493796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Confidentiality for mental health concerns in adolescent primary care. Wissow L; Fothergill K; Forman J Bioethics Forum; 2002; 18(3-4):43-54. PubMed ID: 12744270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Confidential reproductive health services for minors: the potential impact of mandated parental involvement for contraception. Jones RK; Boonstra H Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2004; 36(5):182-91. PubMed ID: 15519960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dilemmas in practice. Burley D Nursing (Lond); 1991 Oct 10-23; 4(43):27-8. PubMed ID: 1945131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Challenging the teenage regulations: the legal battle. Donovan P Fam Plann Perspect; 1983; 15(3):126-30. PubMed ID: 6873257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Psychotherapy and privileged communications in child custody cases. Knapp SJ; Vandecreek L Prof Psychol Res Pr; 1985 Jun; 16(3):398-407. PubMed ID: 11650745 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Misconceived laws: the irrationality of parental involvement requirements for contraception. Arons JR William Mary Law Rev; 2000 Mar; 41(3):1093-131. PubMed ID: 16329212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Mother, may I?: ramifications for parental involvement laws for minors seeking abortion services. Blasdell J Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(2):287-304. PubMed ID: 16526133 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Legal and ethical issues facing adolescent health care professionals. Diaz A; Neal WP; Nucci AT; Ludmer P; Bitterman J; Edwards S Mt Sinai J Med; 2004 May; 71(3):181-5. PubMed ID: 15164132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Maintaining informed consent for doctor-patient confidentiality: more serious failings in the HHS medical regulations. Sobel R J Biolaw Bus; 2003; 6(2):61-5. PubMed ID: 14682371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Parents' rights vs. minors' rights regarding the provision of contraceptives to teenagers. Wardle LD Neb Law Rev; 1989; 68(1-2):216-60. PubMed ID: 11659270 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]