247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10255979)
1. Public opinion influences decision on CON process.
Regan WA
Hosp Prog; 1982 Jul; 63(7):95, 97. PubMed ID: 10255979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Hospital topical law: "A certificate of need".
Morse HN
Hosp Top; 1982; 60(1):2, 18, 28 passim. PubMed ID: 10254145
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Hospital awarded CON for shelled space.
Regan WA
Hosp Prog; 1979 Apr; 60(4):84. PubMed ID: 422174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. MDPH and comparative CON reviews.
Shannon MA
Mich Hosp; 1984 Jun; 20(6):7-10. PubMed ID: 10266671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. P.L. 96-79 changes CON processes.
Kuntz E
Mod Healthc; 1979 Nov; 9(11):50-1. PubMed ID: 492118
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Certificate of need and the pitfalls of due process.
Consedine JF; Jekel JF; Dunaye TM
Inquiry; 1980; 17(4):348-56. PubMed ID: 6450167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Oral Roberts' City of Faith gives planning law a crucial test.
Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1978 Oct; 11(6):28-31. PubMed ID: 10238719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Evolution of certificate of need: an administrator's role.
Trent GE
Case Stud Health Adm; 1978; 1():18-22. PubMed ID: 10287541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Health planning amendments will add to hospitals' certificate-of-need burdens.
Saphier MD
Hosp Forum; 1980; 23(3):47-8. PubMed ID: 10246234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The antitrust status of health planning.
Dolan AK
Health Care Plann Mark; 1982 Jan; 1(4):11-23. PubMed ID: 10254176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Read laws as are, not as might be.
Horty JF
Mod Healthc; 1980 Jun; 10(6):88. PubMed ID: 10247385
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A full plate.
Goldowsky SJ
R I Med J (1976); 1988 Feb; 71(2):51-2. PubMed ID: 3162328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Some states center attention on certificate of need.
Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1979 Apr; 12(2):36-7. PubMed ID: 10324011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Regs control the planning process as well as the plan.
Berriman WT
Hospitals; 1980 Apr; 54(8):51-4. PubMed ID: 7358375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hospital agencies powers lie within law, court rules.
Hospitals; 1979 Jun; 53(11):19-20. PubMed ID: 428942
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Washington struggle mirrors contention elsewhere.
Sullivan A
Emerg Dep News; 1981 Feb; 3(2):3. PubMed ID: 10249585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Status report: health planning and capital expenditure regulation.
Warner DA
Health Law Vigil; 1986 Aug; 9(17):18-9. PubMed ID: 10277552
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Fourth Circuit requires limited rule of reason to be applied in hospital antitrust planning case.
Kinney ED
Health Law Vigil; 1982 Nov; 5(23):6-7. PubMed ID: 10257144
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Hospital Building Co. plans appeal in antitrust suit against Rex Hospital.
Richman D
Mod Healthc; 1985 Feb; 15(4):142. PubMed ID: 10278302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Oklahoma court approves City of Faith certification: cite "national constituency".
Schwartz RL
Health Law Vigil; 1981 Apr; 4(8):10-1. PubMed ID: 10250670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
