These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Rights of ex-patients in the community: the next frontier. Perlin ML Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1980; 8(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 7225587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Presidential address 1985:Inalienable rights of persons with mental retardation. Walker BR Ment Retard; 1985 Oct; 23(5):219-21. PubMed ID: 4069000 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing Human Rights Committees: a mechanism for protecting the rights of institutionalized mentally retarded persons. Kemp DR Ment Retard; 1983 Feb; 21(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 6855566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The right to vote for the institutionalized mentally retarded. Kemp DR N Engl J Hum Serv; 1984; 4(2):34-9. PubMed ID: 10289559 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ensuring the right to minimally adequate habilitation: a proposed role for human rights committees. Reese RM Ment Retard; 1984 Jun; 22(3):142-6. PubMed ID: 6727648 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The new clients: legal services for mentally retarded persons. Herr SS Stanford Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 31(4):553-611. PubMed ID: 10242370 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The silent clients: legal and ethical considerations in representing severely and profoundly retarded individuals. Mickenberg NH Stanford Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 31(4):625-35. PubMed ID: 10242372 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Mentally retarded people and the law: preface. Bazelon DL Stanford Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 31(4):541-4. PubMed ID: 10242368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Conquest of mental retardation. Walker VS Ment Retard; 1988 Oct; 26(5):251-5. PubMed ID: 3193891 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Law 106 proposal. Insufficient guarantees for the protection of the rights of the mentally retarded]. de Wachter M Union Med Can; 1983 May; 112(5):493-4. PubMed ID: 6879864 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fundamental rights, Section 504, and Baby Doe. Turnbull HR Ment Retard; 1983 Oct; 21(5):218-21. PubMed ID: 6664304 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Common sense in the habilitation of mentally retarded persons: a reply to Menolascino and McGee. Ellis NR; Balla D; Estes O; Warren SA; Meyers CE; Hollis J; Isaacson RL; Palk BE; Siegel PS Ment Retard; 1981 Oct; 19(5):221-5. PubMed ID: 7321874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Major legal/ethical challenges in the care and treatment of the mentally retarded. Stark JA; Menolascino FJ; McGee JJ Psychiatr Med; 1984 Sep; 2(3):295-304. PubMed ID: 6242833 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The law and mentally retarded people: an uncertain future. Roos P Stanford Law Rev; 1979 Apr; 31(4):613-24. PubMed ID: 10242371 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of citizen advocacy as a volunteer role in a residential facility for mentally retarded. Bishop TA Volunt Adm; 1979; 12(2):41-8. PubMed ID: 10243738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Termination of provider agreements: the scope of patient's rights. Maloney SA; Lasky PC J Am Health Care Assoc; 1981 Mar; 7(2):57-8. PubMed ID: 10298122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and people with mental retardation. Miller PS Ment Retard; 1999 Apr; 37(2):162-5. PubMed ID: 10337134 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]