These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10257127)
21. The hospital's fiduciary duty to its medical staff. Vipperman RM Med Staff Couns; 1987; 1(2):53-7. PubMed ID: 10284646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Medical staff privileges: time for another look. Sloss PF Trustee; 1979 Feb; 32(2):8, 11-3. PubMed ID: 10240315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Health care as a business. Hirsh HL Leg Med; 1980; ():275-82. PubMed ID: 7421393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Fifth Circuit: hospitals did not violate the Sherman Act. Fraiche DD; Carlson WT Health Law Vigil; 1986 Jul; 9(13):2-3. PubMed ID: 10277100 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The present status of physician privileges. Goldsmith LS; Bertolet M Med Trial Tech Q; 1980; 27(2):121-37. PubMed ID: 6927795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A nonphysician permitted to practice medicine. Johnson MP Case Stud Health Adm; 1980; 2():163-7. PubMed ID: 10250490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The physician and hospital privileges. Hirsch HL Leg Med Q; 1981-1983; 5-7():179-91. PubMed ID: 10287959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Corporate liability: the duty to select and monitor visiting physicians (supervise and report). Hirsh HL Nurs Homes; 1984; 33(4):10-1. PubMed ID: 10283966 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Staff privileges: physician can sue under Sec. 1981 and Title VII. Dunitz EM Health Law Vigil; 1986 Jul; 9(13):3-4. PubMed ID: 10277101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Darling is alive and well in California. Bernstein AH Hospitals; 1982 Oct; 56(19):114, 116-7. PubMed ID: 7118110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Court upholds law's immunities in peer review cases. Kadzielski MA Health Prog; 1990; 71(6):21, 31. PubMed ID: 10105569 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The antitrust laws: implications for physician staff privileges. Peters ME J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1987; 10(2):206-18. PubMed ID: 10286042 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Bell v. Sharp Cabrillo Hospital: defining the hospital's level of corporate responsibility. Chenen AR Med Staff Couns; 1990; 4(2):69-71. PubMed ID: 10104434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Medical staff privileges: is antitrust a real issue for providers? Enders RJ Healthc Financ Manage; 1986 Mar; 40(3):64-70. PubMed ID: 10275454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Damages for emotional distress awarded to physician whose hospital privileges were removed. Hosp Law Newsl; 1989 Nov; 7(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 10296159 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Coping with the problem practitioner: five experts' advice. Hosp Peer Rev; 1979 Aug; 4(8):101-5. PubMed ID: 10243551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]