These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10257188)

  • 1. Performance of a computerized CCU arrhythmia monitor system.
    Amsler BE; Becker LC; Bulkley BH
    J Clin Eng; 1982; 7(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 10257188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Quality control of computer-assisted arrhythmia monitoring].
    Ritz R
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1981 Jun; 111(26):997-1000. PubMed ID: 7268355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a computerized arrhythmia alarm system.
    Frost DA; Yanowitz FG; Pryor TA
    Am J Cardiol; 1977 Apr; 39(4):583-7. PubMed ID: 848444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application and evaluation of automated arrhythmia monitoring in the coronary care unit.
    Hulting J
    Acta Med Scand Suppl; 1979; 630():1-77. PubMed ID: 384749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of a new computerized arrhythmia monitoring system.
    Hultgren HN; Shettigar UR; Specht DF
    Heart Lung; 1975; 4(2):241-51. PubMed ID: 1039979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Real-time arrhythmia detection with supplementary ECG quality and pulse wave monitoring for the reduction of false alarms in ICUs.
    Krasteva V; Jekova I; Leber R; Schmid R; Abächerli R
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Aug; 37(8):1273-97. PubMed ID: 27454550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of arrhythmia alarms from a computer-based arrhythmia monitoring system.
    Hulting J; Nygårds ME
    Acta Med Scand; 1978; 203(3):153-9. PubMed ID: 636911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the ICR 6201 G3 ambulatory electrocardiography system in quantitation of arrhythmias.
    Toivonen LK
    Ann Clin Res; 1985; 17(6):334-6. PubMed ID: 4096491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of arrhythmia computer and conventional monitoring in coronary-care unit.
    Vetter NJ; Julian DG
    Lancet; 1975 May; 1(7917):1151-4. PubMed ID: 48773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unreliability of conventional electrocardiographic monitoring for arrhythmia detection in coronary care units.
    Romhilt DW; Bloomfield SS; Chou TC; Fowler NO
    Am J Cardiol; 1973 Apr; 31(4):457-61. PubMed ID: 4571161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative study of the effects of documentation on arrhythmia detection efficiency.
    Breu CS; Gawlinski A
    Heart Lung; 1981; 10(6):1058-62. PubMed ID: 6913572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cardiovascular monitoring in the coronary care unit.
    Feldman CL; Hubelbank M
    Med Instrum; 1977; 11(5):288-92. PubMed ID: 335194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of radiotelemetry after discharge from the coronary care unit.
    Turkie W; Brown AK
    J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1990 Oct; 24(4):277-80. PubMed ID: 2258842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The quality of ambulatory ECG-recordings and accuracy of semi-automatic arrhythmia analysis. An evaluation of the Medilog-Pathfinder system.
    Bjerregaard P
    Eur Heart J; 1980 Dec; 1(6):417-25. PubMed ID: 7274256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. False alarms during patient monitoring in clinical intensive care units are highly related to poor quality of the monitored electrocardiogram signals.
    Tsimenidis C; Murray A
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Aug; 37(8):1383-91. PubMed ID: 27454130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Long-term electrocardiography: value and reliability of various systems].
    Bethge KP; Gonska BD
    Z Kardiol; 1985 Oct; 74(10):567-79. PubMed ID: 2416139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Suppression of false arrhythmia alarms in the ICU: a machine learning approach.
    Ansari S; Belle A; Ghanbari H; Salamango M; Najarian K
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Aug; 37(8):1186-203. PubMed ID: 27454017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability and limitations of automated arrhythmia detection in telemetric monitoring after stroke.
    Kurka N; Bobinger T; Kallmünzer B; Koehn J; Schellinger PD; Schwab S; Köhrmann M
    Stroke; 2015 Feb; 46(2):560-3. PubMed ID: 25538198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A practical algorithm to reduce false critical ECG alarms using arterial blood pressure and/or photoplethysmogram waveforms.
    Zong W; Nielsen L; Gross B; Brea J; Frassica J
    Physiol Meas; 2016 Aug; 37(8):1355-69. PubMed ID: 27455375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of arrhythmia detectors.
    Murray A
    Eur Heart J; 1980 Dec; 1(6):425-7. PubMed ID: 7274257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.