These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10257438)

  • 1. Aim for excellence in medical records approach.
    Skillicorn SA
    Hosp Peer Rev; 1982 Jul; 7(7):86-8. PubMed ID: 10257438
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Medical record professionals and the performance of concurrent review.
    Alder GC
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1986 Jun; 57(6):16-7. PubMed ID: 10276719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Best practices for improving revenue capture through documentation.
    Richter E; Shelton A; Yu Y
    Healthc Financ Manage; 2007 Jun; 61(6):44-7. PubMed ID: 17571707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Managing the medical record on a concurrent basis: facts and possibilities.
    Berger E; Foster P; Laskowski L; Lu G; Oren D; Prado D
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1988 May; 59(5):24-33. PubMed ID: 10287421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ways to upgrade review of medical records.
    Schneider JF
    QA Rev; 1989 Dec; 1(5):8. PubMed ID: 10313504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Medical record review.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 1987; 7(9-10):8-10. PubMed ID: 10289804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using peer review for self-audits of medical record documentation.
    Bradshaw RW
    Fam Pract Manag; 2000 Apr; 7(4):28-32. PubMed ID: 10947679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Avoiding unnecessary peer review.
    Nelson KM
    QA Rev; 1991; 3(3):1, 8. PubMed ID: 10115142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical pertinence review.
    QRC Advis; 1989 Nov; 6(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 10295774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Professional practice solutions...record completion policies.
    Dougherty M
    J AHIMA; 2003 Feb; 74(2):62, 64. PubMed ID: 12600171
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Documenting clinical findings accurately in postoperative notes.
    Jt Comm Perspect; 2006 Feb; 26(2):7. PubMed ID: 16933548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative records review in an outpatient mental health center.
    Barr SP
    J Am Med Rec Assoc (1980); 1981 Apr; 52(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 10251062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Medical record review for clinical pertinence.
    Schraffenberger LA
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1989 May; 60(5):43-50. PubMed ID: 10292964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Think how records might be used before discarding.
    Hosp Peer Rev; 2003 Feb; 28(2):22-3. PubMed ID: 12647577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Documentation revisited.
    QRC Advis; 1989 Nov; 6(1):1, 8. PubMed ID: 10324701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new approach to the old problem of incomplete patient records.
    Thompson RE
    J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1986 Jul; 57(7):30-1. PubMed ID: 10277311
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient-care documentation.
    Anderson CW
    Emerg Med Serv; 1999 Mar; 28(3):59-62. PubMed ID: 10346609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Documentation: burden or blessing?
    Gutheil TG
    J Am Assoc Med Transcr; 1994; 13(2):39. PubMed ID: 10134754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How the courts view medical records.
    Hirsh HL
    Am Coll Physicians Obs; 1981 Jun; 1(6):4-5. PubMed ID: 10254024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Malpractice risks of documentation.
    Battista ME
    Physicians Manage; 1985 Feb; 25(2):232-4, 238-9, 242 passim. PubMed ID: 10269895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.