These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10257449)

  • 21. Parental consent for a minor's abortion.
    Dickstein LJ
    Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1996; 59(2):44; author reply 46. PubMed ID: 8668715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Abortion in America.
    Shostak AB
    Futurist; 1991; 25(4):20-4. PubMed ID: 16145782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Parental consent for a minor's abortion.
    Herrington P
    Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1996; 59(2):45; author reply 46. PubMed ID: 8668718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Abortion: issues of access, policy, rights continue to be tested.
    Bernstein AH
    Hospitals; 1980 Feb; 54(3):28-30. PubMed ID: 7351319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bioethics discovers the Bill of Rights.
    Veatch RM
    Natl Forum; 1989; 69(4):11-3. PubMed ID: 16100834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness.
    Ehrlich JS
    Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. What physicians need to know about the legal status of abortion in the United States.
    Weitz TA
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jun; 52(2):130-9. PubMed ID: 19407519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Parents' consent for a minor's abortion.
    Fanning GL
    Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1996; 59(3):46-7. PubMed ID: 9074324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The physician's duty to screen patients for elective surgery.
    Simon MG
    Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1980 Feb; (12):3-30. PubMed ID: 10316970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The impact of Mississippi's mandatory delay law on the timing of abortion.
    Joyce T; Kaestner R
    Fam Plann Perspect; 2000; 32(1):4-13. PubMed ID: 10710701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Contemporary Australian abortion law: the description of a crime and the negation of a woman's right to abortion.
    Rankin MJ
    Monash Univ Law Rev; 2001; 27(2):229-52. PubMed ID: 16493805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Two letters about Dr. Halperin's article on abortion.
    N C Med J; 1989 Jun; 50(6):347-9. PubMed ID: 2739760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The inapplicability of parental involvement laws to the distribution of mifepristone (RU-486) to minors.
    Scuder AC
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 2002; 10(3):711-41. PubMed ID: 16594112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Grounded in the reality of their lives: listening to teens who make the abortion decision without involving their parents.
    Ehrlich JS
    Berkeley Womens Law J; 2003; 18():61-180. PubMed ID: 15156878
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. My body, my consent: securing the constitutional right to abortion funding.
    McDonagh EL
    Albany Law Rev; 1999; 62(3):1057-1118. PubMed ID: 10558501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Maintaining access to safe abortion in the United States: a post-Gonzales primer and guide to action.
    Jordan B; Pace L
    Contraception; 2007 Sep; 76(3):179-81. PubMed ID: 17707713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Enforcement of state abortion statutes after Roe: a state-by-state analysis.
    Linton PB
    Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1990; 67(2):157-259. PubMed ID: 11659261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Do you still need parental consent to treat a minor?
    Holoweiko M
    Med Econ; 1979 Sep; 56(19):218-20, 222-4, 228-9. PubMed ID: 10277984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The minor's right of privacy: limitations on state action after Danforth and Carey.
    Siliciano JA
    Columbia Law Rev; 1977 Dec; 77(8):1216-46. PubMed ID: 10273154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Court stands by abortion.
    Press A; Camper D
    Newsweek; 1983 Jun; 101(26):62-3. PubMed ID: 10260662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.