229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10257728)
1. Word processing: a key to increased productivity in medical record departments.
Dennis A
Tex Hosp; 1982 Oct; 38(5):32-5. PubMed ID: 10257728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Word processing for the medical record department and beyond.
Salazar R
Top Health Rec Manage; 1983 Sep; 4(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 10310218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A decentralized approach to word processing in a hospital setting.
Moehring MJ; Proctor M
Top Health Rec Manage; 1984 Jun; 4(4):74-82. PubMed ID: 10266786
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Word processing system at Porter Memorial Hospital.
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Mar; 54(3):39-40. PubMed ID: 10309871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A cost justification: word processing in a medical transcription environment.
Bifano JL
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Oct; 54(10):13-7. PubMed ID: 10310237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Automation in the medical record department: a bibliography (1983 to present). Part I of a series.
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1988 Oct; 59(10):56-7. PubMed ID: 10302853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Measuring productivity in medical record departments.
Barnes TW
Top Health Rec Manage; 1983 Dec; 4(2):19-31. PubMed ID: 10263567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Computerization in the medical record department at Pioneer Valley Hospital.
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1985 Feb; 56(2):42-3. PubMed ID: 10278300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Coordination is key to increased productivity.
Hosp Superv Bull; 1983 Jan; (454):1-4. PubMed ID: 10258305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical record department productivity standards: a case study.
Terlep M; Poli P
Top Health Rec Manage; 1983 Dec; 4(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 10263573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A labor productivity monitoring system in the medical record department.
Kelm JM; Nelson AT; Schramm WR
Top Health Rec Manage; 1983 Dec; 4(2):32-46. PubMed ID: 10263568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Turning expectations into performance: administration's goals for medical record department influence productivity and effectiveness.
Ripple B
Tex Hosp; 1982 Oct; 38(5):9-10. PubMed ID: 10257732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Preparing for prospective payment. Part V: Productivity in the medical record department.
Flanagan JB; Sourapas KJ
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1984 Mar; 55(3):23-5. PubMed ID: 10310455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Benefits of computerizing medical records discussed.
Eggert AE
Tex Hosp; 1985 Oct; 41(5):22-4. PubMed ID: 10275724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The medical records mess. One hospital's solution.
Sweeney P
Softw Healthc; 1986; 4(5):34-5. PubMed ID: 10279549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Hospitals embrace medical records automation.
Packer CL
Hospitals; 1988 Jun; 62(12):84-5. PubMed ID: 3378781
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Breaking up the paper log-jam.
Baillie J
Hosp Adm Can; 1978 May; 20(5):28-9. PubMed ID: 10307572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Departmental productivity measurement/reporting in the medical record setting.
Kahl K; Kebisek J
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1989 Apr; 60(4):29-35. PubMed ID: 10292375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interim targeting: a productivity improvement method that works.
Kahl K; Peterson C; Dickson G
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1990 Apr; 61(4):31-9. PubMed ID: 10104362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Ergonomics: the people factor.
Masencup B
Top Health Rec Manage; 1983 Sep; 4(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 10262549
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
