These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10258284)

  • 1. Judicial scrutiny prevails over decisions by hospitals' credentials committees.
    Regan WA
    Hosp Prog; 1983 Feb; 64(2):80. PubMed ID: 10258284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Court ruling clarifies judicial review of physician's ouster by hospital.
    Horty J
    Mod Healthc; 1984 Nov; 14(14):168-70. PubMed ID: 10268798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hospitals' viewpoint: staff privileges--the substantive issues.
    Berriman WT
    Am Med News; 1982 Jul; 25(28):8. PubMed ID: 10257780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Credentials committee.
    George JE
    J Med Soc N J; 1983 Oct; 80(10):802. PubMed ID: 6580451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. California Supreme Court requires judicial deference to initial hospital medical staff decisions.
    Christensen JD; Saunders JA
    Health Law Vigil; 1983 Feb; 6(4):4-6. PubMed ID: 10258300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The case of the non-curious members of the credentials committee.
    Rasinski D
    Internist; 1984 Jul; 25(6):27. PubMed ID: 10267885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Staff privileges: physician can sue under Sec. 1981 and Title VII.
    Dunitz EM
    Health Law Vigil; 1986 Jul; 9(13):3-4. PubMed ID: 10277101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Approaches to improving health care: dealing with the "problem" physician.
    Jessee WF; Brenner LH
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1982 Jan; 8(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 6803204
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Federal district court dismisses alleged antitrust and civil rights violations in Florida hospitals' denial of staff privileges.
    O'Brien JP
    Health Law Vigil; 1981 Sep; 4(19):10-1. PubMed ID: 10252310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hospital medical staff bylaws: an Indiana model.
    Holden RW; Manning GC; Strycker DL; Dyer RL; Gentile JP; Christian JE
    Indiana Med; 1987 Jan; 80(1):44-5. PubMed ID: 3819374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medical staff privileges: time for another look.
    Sloss PF
    Trustee; 1979 Feb; 32(2):8, 11-3. PubMed ID: 10240315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The problem physician: legal threat or legal menace?
    Davis CD
    Tex Hosp; 1982 Feb; 37(9):35-6. PubMed ID: 10254665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Federal age discrimination act may not affect hospitals' moves on appointments, privileges.
    Horty J
    Mod Healthc; 1987 Apr; 17(8):82-3. PubMed ID: 10281469
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Law guards M.D.'s privacy, but gives board access to psychiatric records.
    Horty JF
    Mod Healthc; 1982 Sep; 12(9):102. PubMed ID: 10256752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recent case offers hospitals new protection from antitrust liability.
    Davis CD
    Tex Hosp; 1985 Jul; 41(2):48-9. PubMed ID: 10278343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gianetti v Norwalk Hospital: Connecticut Supreme Court rules on hospital and medical staff member contractual relationship and judicial review of medical staff termination decisions.
    Ronai SE; Hyman PE
    Conn Med; 1989 Jul; 53(7):425-6. PubMed ID: 2758833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The hospital's fiduciary duty to its medical staff.
    Vipperman RM
    Med Staff Couns; 1987; 1(2):53-7. PubMed ID: 10284646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medical staff membership. An elusive privilege for PAs.
    Morris C
    Physician Assist; 1993 Jan; 17(1):99-103, 106. PubMed ID: 10136581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Decisions about hospital staff privileges: a case for judicial deference.
    Hollowell EE
    Law Med Health Care; 1983 Jun; 11(3):118-20, 134. PubMed ID: 6560177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Federal court refuses to honor state statutory privilege for proceedings of medical staff credentials committee.
    Schwartz RL
    Health Law Vigil; 1981 Nov; 4(23):4-5. PubMed ID: 10253107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.