These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10258300)

  • 1. California Supreme Court requires judicial deference to initial hospital medical staff decisions.
    Christensen JD; Saunders JA
    Health Law Vigil; 1983 Feb; 6(4):4-6. PubMed ID: 10258300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Gianetti v Norwalk Hospital: Connecticut Supreme Court rules on hospital and medical staff member contractual relationship and judicial review of medical staff termination decisions.
    Ronai SE; Hyman PE
    Conn Med; 1989 Jul; 53(7):425-6. PubMed ID: 2758833
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medical staff privileges: time for another look.
    Sloss PF
    Trustee; 1979 Feb; 32(2):8, 11-3. PubMed ID: 10240315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Federal court limits federal antitrust jurisdiction over medical staff decisions.
    Christensen JD
    Health Law Vigil; 1984 Jan; 7(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 10264312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Court upholds rational approach to granting medical staff privileges.
    Kadzielski MA
    Health Prog; 1987 Mar; 68(2):14. PubMed ID: 10280966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. California High Court rules on ability to work with others as criterion for medical staff privileges: must be related to patient care.
    Schwartz R
    Health Law Vigil; 1980 Aug; 3(17):1-2. PubMed ID: 10247620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. California court clarifies medical staff hearing procedures.
    Christensen JD
    Health Law Vigil; 1988 Apr; 11(9):7-8. PubMed ID: 10286816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. More novel judicial opinions from California.
    Bernstein AH
    Hospitals; 1980 Dec; 54(23):45-7. PubMed ID: 7429456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The hospital's fiduciary duty to its medical staff.
    Vipperman RM
    Med Staff Couns; 1987; 1(2):53-7. PubMed ID: 10284646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Supreme Court declines review of staff privileges, other health cases.
    McCann RW
    Health Law Vigil; 1985 Apr; 8(8):1-3. PubMed ID: 10270686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Judicial incentive for quality control.
    Boone RW
    Hosp Risk Manage; 1982 Dec; 4(12):162-3. PubMed ID: 10258746
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Decisions about hospital staff privileges: a case for judicial deference.
    Hollowell EE
    Law Med Health Care; 1983 Jun; 11(3):118-20, 134. PubMed ID: 6560177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hospital staff privileges for nonphysicians.
    George JE
    J Med Soc N J; 1984 Feb; 81(2):107. PubMed ID: 6585553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Court ruling clarifies judicial review of physician's ouster by hospital.
    Horty J
    Mod Healthc; 1984 Nov; 14(14):168-70. PubMed ID: 10268798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Court upholds law's immunities in peer review cases.
    Kadzielski MA
    Health Prog; 1990; 71(6):21, 31. PubMed ID: 10105569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hospital privileges are a property interest.
    Carlova J
    Med Econ; 1986 Aug; 63(16):21-5, 28. PubMed ID: 10277668
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Judicial scrutiny prevails over decisions by hospitals' credentials committees.
    Regan WA
    Hosp Prog; 1983 Feb; 64(2):80. PubMed ID: 10258284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Court upholds Catholic hospital's right to close a service.
    Kadzielski MA
    Health Prog; 1989 Sep; 70(7):60. PubMed ID: 10294412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychologists' staff privileges in dispute.
    Holthaus D
    Hospitals; 1989 Jan; 63(2):52. PubMed ID: 2910798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is this a Waterloo in the privileges war?
    Carlova J
    Med Econ; 1985 Jan; 62(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 10270769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.