235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10258416)
21. FTC scrutiny of health care to be debated again..
Prout DM
Am Coll Physicians Obs; 1983 Mar; 3(3):8-9. PubMed ID: 10259352
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. "Free choice" as a restraint of trade in American health care delivery and insurance.
Weller CD
Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1986 Oct; 8(8):7-48. PubMed ID: 10280591
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. AMA's approval of FEC guidelines called restraint of trade by NAFEC.
McCann J
Emerg Dep News; 1983 Sep; 5(9):1, 12. PubMed ID: 10262215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Lawmakers concur with ACP on key aspects of debate.
Am Coll Physicians Obs; 1983; 3(7):3. PubMed ID: 10263084
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. FTC, medical staffs reach agreements.
Burda D
Mod Healthc; 1988 Feb; 18(6):6. PubMed ID: 10285864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. FTC rules on Michigan and Indiana antitrust cases.
Rose A
Health Law Vigil; 1983 Mar; 6(6):7-9. PubMed ID: 10278148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. What competition can do to peer review.
Holoweiko M
Med Econ; 1985 Aug; 62(17):122-7, 131-9. PubMed ID: 10278339
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Procompetitive standards OK, lawyer assures PPRC.
Pollner F
Med World News; 1989 Feb; 30(3):55. PubMed ID: 10294486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. More competition, antitrust laws will not lead to better care.
Klein J
Psychiatr News; 1983 Jun; 18(11):1, 18. PubMed ID: 10263530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Federal antitrust laws and hospital concerns.
Gramza M; Gire M
Hosp Admin Curr; 1983; 27(3):13-8. PubMed ID: 10261676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Impact of Patrick v Burget.
JCAH Perspect; 1986; 6(7-8):7-9. PubMed ID: 10289700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Steering clear of an antitrust charge.
Trombetta WL
Med Econ; 1986 Aug; 63(16):105-9, 112. PubMed ID: 10277667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Physician agreements to control medical prepayment plans: Federal Trade Commission. Adoption and publication of enforcement policy with respect to physician agreements to control medical prepayment plans.
Fed Regist; 1981 Oct; 46(192):48982-92. PubMed ID: 10252959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Market definition, market power, and potential competition.
Horowitz I
Q Rev Econ Bus; 1982; 22(3):23-42. PubMed ID: 10257262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Historic Supreme Court decisions make clear that health care area is subject to antitrust scrutiny.
Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1982 Aug; 37(2):8-10. PubMed ID: 10259394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The year in review: significant health antitrust cases.
Miles JJ
Health Law Vigil; 1986 Jun; 9(11):3-7. PubMed ID: 10276706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Health care and antitrust.
Heitler G
Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1985 Jan; 6(11):5-35. PubMed ID: 10269565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Patient care not enough as defense for provider conduct.
Hammaker MK
Provider; 1987 Dec; 13(12):30-1, 40. PubMed ID: 10285093
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Peer review of fees by physician groups: antitrust issues.
Scott M
Health Law Vigil; 1986 Jul; 9(14):5-8. PubMed ID: 10277308
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. General Electric may violate antitrust law with purchase of medical imaging business.
Carter K
Mod Healthc; 1986 Apr; 16(9):22. PubMed ID: 10276446
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
