These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10258467)

  • 1. Parallel review allows teamwork.
    Bartek W
    Tex Hosp; 1983 Jan; 38(8):9. PubMed ID: 10258467
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exploding 12 myths about quality assurance and peer review.
    Thompson RE
    Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(4):39-49. PubMed ID: 10290183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer review: the aims and guidelines of a program to improve quality of care.
    J Am Health Care Assoc; 1976 Jan; 2(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 10246890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Utilization and quality control peer review organizations--a rose by any other name . . . ?
    Berg RN
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1982 Nov; 71(11):793-6. PubMed ID: 6890977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Private review-its impact on health care and physicians.
    Sandrick KM
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1982 Apr; 8(4):5-6. PubMed ID: 6806740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. PRO director on the review process.
    Slonim C
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1989 Jun; 76(6):511-3. PubMed ID: 2700365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. QI in radiology.
    QA Rev; 1990 Dec; 2(10):1, 3. PubMed ID: 10114839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peer review: a new tool for quality improvement.
    Edwards MT
    Physician Exec; 2009; 35(5):54-9. PubMed ID: 19780389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hospitals and review.
    Thompson RW
    Ala J Med Sci; 1985 Oct; 22(4):400-2. PubMed ID: 4073390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The limits of medical quality assurance systems.
    Burton RM
    Physician Exec; 1992; 18(3):39-42. PubMed ID: 10118409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing clinical competence: a five-year experiment comes to an end.
    Am Coll Physicians Obs; 1983 Sep; 3(8):1, 22-3. PubMed ID: 10263085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Further development of peer-review-procedures in medical rehabilitation].
    Farin E; Carl C; Jäckel WH; Rütten-Köppel E; Maier-Riehle B; Berghaus U
    Rehabilitation (Stuttg); 2004 Jun; 43(3):162-5. PubMed ID: 15202040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New physician review process stresses intervention.
    Welte K
    Minn Med; 1987 Sep; 70(9):500. PubMed ID: 3670246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What are your goals for peer review? A framework for understanding differing methods.
    Fotenos A; Nagy P
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Dec; 9(12):929-30. PubMed ID: 23206652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Peer review in quality assurance.
    Warner CK
    HMO Pract; 1989; 3(5):178-82. PubMed ID: 10296986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer review: central specialist committee statement.
    McKean WI
    N Z Med J; 1983 Mar; 96(728):214-5. PubMed ID: 6572827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality assurance: fact or fiction.
    Casey JH
    Nebr Med J; 1990 Oct; 75(10):275-6. PubMed ID: 2074903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medical staff motivation and peer review.
    Merry MD
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1984 Dec; 5(2):21-31. PubMed ID: 10268842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quality assurance in long-term care.
    Smits HL
    World Hosp; 1982 Feb; 18(1):37-9. PubMed ID: 10309589
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality assessment tools: ACOG Voluntary Review of Quality of Care Program, Peer Review Reporting System.
    Lichtmacher A
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2008 Mar; 35(1):147-62, x. PubMed ID: 18319133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.