These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10259398)
1. The 'bottom line' after Connecticut v. Teal. Blumrosen AW Employee Relat Law J; 1983; 8(4):572-86. PubMed ID: 10259398 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Court acceptance of Uniform Guidelines provisions: the bottom line and the search for alternatives. Thompson DE; Christiansen PS Employee Relat Law J; 1983; 8(4):587-602. PubMed ID: 10259399 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. After Bakke many questions are left unanswered. Graumann FW; Lippman ME Hospitals; 1978 Nov; 52(22):73-5. PubMed ID: 700653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. More on Bakke. Sweigert WT Pers Adm; 1978 Oct; 23(10):6-8. PubMed ID: 10238890 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A review of legal challenges to personnel testing. Hinkel AL J Ment Health Adm; 1981; 8(2):49-51. PubMed ID: 10252025 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Alternative selection procedures and the Uniform Guidelines: improving the quality of employer investigations. Florkowski GW Employee Relat Law J; 1983; 8(4):603-17. PubMed ID: 10259400 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Issues in hiring the handicapped: a positive outlook. Strom LJ; Ferris GR Pers Adm; 1982 Aug; 27(8):75-81. PubMed ID: 10317266 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. An EEO examination of employment applications. Miller EC Pers Adm; 1980 Mar; 25(3):63-9, 81. PubMed ID: 10245591 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The legal protections for employees with AIDS. Cihon P J Health Hum Resour Adm; 1988; 10(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 10318109 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A businessman's view of the Privacy Commission's employment recommendations. Kanutz AH Pers Adm; 1978 Apr; 23(4):55-7. PubMed ID: 10307079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Affirmative action for the handicapped and veterans: interpretative and operational guidelines. Jackson DP Labor Law J; 1978 Feb; 29(2):107-17. PubMed ID: 10316607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Employment discrimination against the handicapped and Section 504 of the Rehabiliation Act: an essay on legal evasiveness. Harv Law Rev; 1984 Feb; 97(4):997-1015. PubMed ID: 10317440 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Burger Court and the prima facie case in employment discrimination litigation: a critique. Friedman JW Cornell Law Rev; 1979 Nov; 65(1):1-56. PubMed ID: 10245114 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Supreme Court, 1978-79--labor relations and employment discrimination. Modjeska L Cornell Law Rev; 1979 Nov; 65(1):57-74. PubMed ID: 10245115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. New trends in employment discrimination litigation. Linn BJ Trial; 1978 Oct; 14(10):32-5, 46-8. PubMed ID: 10316697 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Title VII discrimination in biochemical testing for AIDS and marijuana. Martin AA Duke Law J; 1988 Feb; (1):129-53. PubMed ID: 10295383 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]