These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10261968)

  • 1. Purchasing dilemma: replace or refurbish.
    Siedband MP
    Radiol Manage; 1981 Dec; 4(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 10261968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trials and tribulations of the radiology administrator: purchasing.
    Robischon T
    Appl Radiol; 1982; 11(4):77-81. PubMed ID: 10262044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The MRI decision process.
    Di Giacinto TM; Bonito RT; Bauman L
    Adm Radiol; 1990 Jan; 9(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 10106390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimizing productivity. A program cycle for equipment acquisition.
    Johnson KC
    Appl Radiol; 1985; 14(3):95-7. PubMed ID: 10280630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Objective equipment selection and performance evaluation.
    Berry GC; Starchman DE; Howland WJ
    Radiol Manage; 1980; 2(5):14-26. PubMed ID: 10249214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ergonomics in ultrasound equipment: productivity and patient throughput.
    Atjak A; Gattinella JA
    Radiol Manage; 1989; 11(4):38-40. PubMed ID: 10304180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Experience with the SIMEDOS radiology information system in a central department for x-ray diagnosis].
    Dombrowski H; List E
    Radiologe; 1988 May; 28(5):204-8. PubMed ID: 3393639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Linking administrator & physician. Collaboration in capital equipment decisions.
    Sliwinski R; Varnum J
    Adm Radiol; 1990 Jul; 9(7):21-4. PubMed ID: 10105839
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A cautious approach to radiology information management systems.
    Rowe WM
    Appl Radiol; 1987 Jan; 16(1):45-8, 94. PubMed ID: 10280638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Choosing a radiology information system.
    Dietrich S; Laxton B
    Radiol Manage; 1988; 10(2):39-42. PubMed ID: 10287345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.
    Benedetto AR
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(2):40-53. PubMed ID: 12800564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Radiology business lines.
    Rothstein RM
    Adm Radiol; 1990 Mar; 9(3):26, 28-9. PubMed ID: 10106583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Issues in software selection for radiology department management.
    Day N
    Appl Radiol; 1987 Jun; 16(6):41-2, 44. PubMed ID: 10287000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automating the radiology department: how to select the right system.
    Hayden CF
    Radiol Manage; 1985 Sep; 7(4):10-2. PubMed ID: 10281496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiology information systems are worth their cost.
    Johnson RL
    US Healthc; 1988 Sep; 5(9):48-9. PubMed ID: 10291036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The single most important event in a PERT chart.
    Johnson KC; Priday DM
    Radiol Manage; 1982 Sep; 4(4):18-20. PubMed ID: 10258091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The path to a fully digital department.
    Champagne J
    Adm Radiol; 1989 May; 8(5):42-3. PubMed ID: 10324650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. X-ray reports faster and cheaper.
    Rosen RA
    Appl Radiol; 1988 Aug; 17(8):18-9. PubMed ID: 10288803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Developments in digital radiography.
    Cannavo MJ
    Comput Healthc; 1989 May; 10(5):35-6. PubMed ID: 10292781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selecting an RIS: a three-phase process.
    Waring PJ
    Radiol Manage; 1987; 9(4):55-7. PubMed ID: 10301980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.