162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10262215)
1. AMA's approval of FEC guidelines called restraint of trade by NAFEC.
McCann J
Emerg Dep News; 1983 Sep; 5(9):1, 12. PubMed ID: 10262215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The AMA's big loss in Congress.
New Physician; 1983; 32(1):27-8. PubMed ID: 10258416
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Perspectives. Chiropractors: AMA's bone of contention.
Olson EG
Faulkner Grays Med Health; 1990 Apr; 44(14):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10104063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Trade restraint suit filed against AMA.
Med World News; 1983 Aug; 24(15):74. PubMed ID: 10261843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Emergency center group hits AMA guidelines.
McIlrath S
Am Med News; 1983 Jul 22-29; 26(27):1, 18. PubMed ID: 10262036
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Antitrust, joint ventures and the end of the AMA's contract practice ethics: new ways of thinking about the health care industry.
Weller CD
Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1984 Oct; 6(8):7-36. PubMed ID: 10268450
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. "Free choice" as a restraint of trade in American health care delivery and insurance.
Weller CD
Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1985 May; 7(3):5-46. PubMed ID: 10300085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. AMA's Todd pushes for reform--cautiously. Interview by Richard L. Clark.
Todd JS
Healthc Financ Manage; 1993 May; 47(5):20-4. PubMed ID: 10145806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The AMA's stamp of approval ... AMAP. American Medical Accreditation Program.
Freeman J
Iowa Med; 1997; 87(9):354-5. PubMed ID: 9425772
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. AMA's blueprint for the future.
Lacsamana RG
J Fla Med Assoc; 1990 May; 77(5):503. PubMed ID: 2351938
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Wilk v. American Medical Association--AMA enjoined from advocating boycott of chiropractors; individual choice endorsed.
Cohen HH
Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(2):63-9. PubMed ID: 10286483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Special report on the AMA's financial situation.
Conn Med; 1975 Jun; 39(6):397-9. PubMed ID: 1139936
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The AMA's stake in VE: safeguarding the profession, patients.
Hosp Med Staff; 1978 Jul; 7(7):19-22. PubMed ID: 10307636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Statement from AMA's general counsel.
Johnson KB
JAMA; 1988 Jan; 259(1):83. PubMed ID: 3334778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Advertising--a test case.
World Med J; 1983; 30(3):40-1. PubMed ID: 10262599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. AMA's union approval raises troubling issues.
La Puma J
Manag Care; 1999 Aug; 8(8):56, 59. PubMed ID: 10557928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. AMA's priorities: shedding FTC monkey and getting doctors to read their mail.
Sammons J
Mich Med; 1982 Dec; 81(56):686. PubMed ID: 7167057
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. AMA's seal of approval. Group plans to start universal accreditation of docs this summer in Massachusetts.
Jaklevic MC
Mod Healthc; 1997 Mar; 27(11):33. PubMed ID: 10165505
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Perspectives. Wakened FTC worries providers.
Mcgraw Hills Med Health; 1988 Apr; 42(14):suppl 4 p.. PubMed ID: 10286492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Winning the competition game.
McQueen I
Emergency; 1989 Sep; 21(9):38-41. PubMed ID: 10294312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
