BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10262250)

  • 1. HMO-employer contracts.
    Krasner W
    Group Health J; 1983; 4(2):16-23. PubMed ID: 10262250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selective contracting: California's hot potato?
    Berger JD
    Hosp Forum; 1982; 25(6):7-14. PubMed ID: 10298694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Health maintenance organizations; procedures for enforcement of employer compliance.
    Fed Regist; 1979 May; 44(105):31046-7. PubMed ID: 10241577
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. NAIC (National Association of Insurance Commissioners) proposal would increase hospitals' HMO contract risk.
    Larkin H
    Hospitals; 1988 Oct; 62(19):45. PubMed ID: 3417259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proposed amendments to HMO dual choice rules.
    Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1979 Sep; 34(3):12-3, 99. PubMed ID: 10277981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Borden's stance challenges HMO law.
    Emmrich S
    Bus Insur; 1980 Apr; 14(17):14, 36. PubMed ID: 10246092
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Howard Veit: ERISA does not block HMO development.
    Veit HR
    Mod Healthc; 1978 Oct; 8(10):66. PubMed ID: 151213
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contractual arrangements between lay corporations and physicians--patient safeguards.
    Wilcox DP
    Tex Med; 1985 Jul; 81(7):61-3. PubMed ID: 4035600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Unbridled managed care: when consumers experience antitrust welfare loss from exclusionary contracts between HMO insurers and health care providers.
    Ruskin A
    Health Matrix Clevel; 1996; 6(2):391-469. PubMed ID: 10178393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Employers suffer sickly effects from government's HMO treatment.
    Keene KK
    Bus Insur; 1979 Oct; 13(21):41, 43. PubMed ID: 10243805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Federal appellate court upholds HMO liability.
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1990 Sep; 7(11):6. PubMed ID: 10106009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Court says ERISA law supercedes HMO act.
    Horty JF
    Mod Healthc; 1978 Jun; 8(6):48, 51. PubMed ID: 148584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What is the HMO Act and what is its impact on employers?
    Sloan A
    Employee Relat Law J; 1979; 4(4):608-12. PubMed ID: 10294900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ERISA: protection for the HMO industry against bad faith claims.
    Bacon DL; Miles DE
    GHAA J; 1988; 9(2):14-9. PubMed ID: 10291737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Medical malpractice: some implications of contract and arbitration in HMOs.
    Stevens CM
    Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1981; 59(1):59-88. PubMed ID: 6926735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prepaid medical service plans; revocation of part.
    Fed Regist; 1978 May; 44(103):30341. PubMed ID: 10241575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Health maintenance organizations; employees' health benefits plans--final regulation.
    Fed Regist; 1979 Jul; 44(139):42081-91. PubMed ID: 10242799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Health Maintenance Organizations: employees' health benefits plan.
    Fed Regist; 1978 Apr; 43(80):17681-7. PubMed ID: 10307346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preferred provider plans and contracts with physicians.
    Wilcox DP
    Tex Med; 1986 Sep; 82(9):65-7. PubMed ID: 3775685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Creativity, caution needed when negotiating HMO contracts.
    Luce GM; Davis GS
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1989 Nov; 43(11):19-22, 24-7. PubMed ID: 10295848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.