These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10262635)

  • 1. A review of outcome studies.
    Hall DJ
    Med Rec Health Care Inf J; 1982 Nov; 23(4):93-6, 105-8. PubMed ID: 10262635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Health indicators: what are they? An approach to efficacy in health care.
    Lewis AF; Modle WJ
    Health Trends; 1982 Feb; 14(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 10254762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The value of sanity.
    Stevens A
    Health Serv J; 1989 Apr; 99(5147):485. PubMed ID: 10313029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ins and outcomes.
    Roberts H
    Health Serv J; 1990 Nov; 100(5225):1653-4. PubMed ID: 10108242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Experts point out pitfalls of using patient reported outcomes to guide NHS care.
    Bhumbra R
    BMJ; 2012 Nov; 345():e8133. PubMed ID: 23191960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can readmission rates be used as an outcome indicator?
    Milne R; Clarke A
    BMJ; 1990 Nov; 301(6761):1139-40. PubMed ID: 2252926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Medicine's need for kaizen.
    Smith R
    BMJ; 1990 Oct; 301(6754):679-80. PubMed ID: 2224234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety in numbers.
    Lunn JN
    Anaesthesia; 1990 Dec; 45(12):1007-8. PubMed ID: 2278321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcome assessment.
    N Engl J Med; 1987 Jul; 317(4):251-2. PubMed ID: 3600717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using outcome indicators to evaluate quality of care.
    Roberts JS; Prevost JA
    Internist; 1987 Sep; 28(8):10-5. PubMed ID: 10283390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Functional assessment and outcome measurement: an integrative review.
    Brown M; Gordon WA; Diller L
    Annu Rev Rehabil; 1983; 3():93-120. PubMed ID: 6614888
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The challenge of justifying services.
    Rasumoff D
    Emerg Med Serv; 1998 Sep; 27(9):30-1. PubMed ID: 10185414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the outcome.
    Gilder SS
    S Afr Med J; 1987 Apr; 71(8):480-1. PubMed ID: 3563809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. From process to outcome in infection control.
    Larson E; Oram LF
    J Nurs Qual Assur; 1989 Nov; 4(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 2600156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Occurrence screening can improve QA programs.
    Carlow D
    Dimens Health Serv; 1988 Jun; 65(5):20-2. PubMed ID: 3255632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Designing an evaluation protocol.
    Piserchia P; Hartwell T
    Corp Comment; 1985 Nov; 1(5):38-46. PubMed ID: 10274391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ten steps to planning the evaluation.
    Kelly K
    Corp Comment; 1985 Nov; 1(5):30-7. PubMed ID: 10274390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring the quality of medical care: process versus outcome.
    McAuliffe WE
    Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc; 1979; 57(1):118-52. PubMed ID: 253196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring quality of care.
    Horwitz M
    Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(4):31-8. PubMed ID: 10290182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes?
    Birkmeyer JD; Dimick JB; Birkmeyer NJ
    J Am Coll Surg; 2004 Apr; 198(4):626-32. PubMed ID: 15051016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.