BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10262948)

  • 1. Calculating merit increases: a structured approach.
    Seithel WW; Emans JS
    Personnel; 1983; 60(5):56-68. PubMed ID: 10262948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Allocating your merit increases the SMART way.
    Miller RT; Campbell JL; Sherman TL
    J Nurs Adm; 1983 Mar; 13(3):32-5. PubMed ID: 6550076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Compensating the red-circle employee.
    Reed PR; Kroll MJ
    Health Prog; 1985 Oct; 66(8):39-41. PubMed ID: 10274197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating salary increases.
    Axelrod CW
    Pers J; 1978 Dec; 57(12):676-9, 697. PubMed ID: 10239503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Market indexed compensation.
    Turnasella T
    Pers Adm; 1984 May; 29(5):27, 30-9. PubMed ID: 10266280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pay raises: merit or seniority?
    Umiker WO
    MLO Med Lab Obs; 1983 Sep; 15(9):63-8. PubMed ID: 10262432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pay increase guidelines with merit.
    Doyel HW; Johnson JL
    Pers J; 1985 Jun; 64(6):46, 49-50. PubMed ID: 10271646
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Merit pay: fact or fiction?
    Lawler EE
    Manage Rev; 1981 Apr; 70(4):50-3. PubMed ID: 10251505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Current methods, problems and future trends. The merit of merit pay.
    Printz RA; Waldman DA
    Pers Adm; 1985 Jan; 30(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 10269516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance appraisal: match the tool to the task.
    McMillan JD; Doyel HW
    Personnel; 1980; 57(4):12-20. PubMed ID: 10248411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wrestling with pay equity? Design your own merit pay delivery system.
    Brinks JT
    Mod Healthc; 1981 Mar; 11(3):108, 110, 112. PubMed ID: 10250322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Resolving the merit pay dilemma demands HR involvement in compensation philosophy.
    Browdy JD
    Healthc Hum Resour; 1993 Oct; 2(10):10-1. PubMed ID: 10135941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.
    Benedetto AR
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(2):40-53. PubMed ID: 12800564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New thinking on how to link executive pay with performance.
    Rappaport A
    Harv Bus Rev; 1999; 77(2):91-101, 186. PubMed ID: 10387774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pay-for-performance.
    Hosp Food Nutr Focus; 1990 Apr; 6(8):4-7. PubMed ID: 10104227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Putting teeth into pay-for-performance programs.
    Jones DW; Hauser MC
    Healthc Financ Manage; 1991 Sep; 45(9):32, 34, 36 passim. PubMed ID: 10145492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When salaries aren't secret.
    Case J
    Harv Bus Rev; 2001 May; 79(5):37-9, 42-9, 163. PubMed ID: 11345911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Salary programs have merit.
    Kinmon GH
    Med Group Manage; 1985; 32(6):34-6, 42. PubMed ID: 10274248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance appraisal: can we 'manage' away the curse?
    Lee C
    Radiol Manage; 1997; 19(2):46-54. PubMed ID: 10166747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Extending the flexible spine of pay.
    Davies P
    Health Serv J; 1988 Dec; 98(5130):1442. PubMed ID: 10290747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.