These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10263291)
1. The 1983 Supreme Court abortion decisions: impact on hospitals, a conflict with Baby Doe? Carlson RA Health Law Vigil; 1983 Oct; 6(21):2-7. PubMed ID: 10263291 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Baby Doe: AHA prevails in Supreme Court. Ahern ML Health Law Vigil; 1986 Jun; 9(12):1-4. PubMed ID: 10276708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. AHA files brief in U.S. Supreme Court in "Baby Doe" case. Ahern ML Health Law Vigil; 1985 Nov; 8(23):1-2. PubMed ID: 10317657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice. Sayeed SA Pediatrics; 2005 Oct; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. District Court judge invalidates Baby Doe regulations. Ahern ML Health Law Vigil; 1984 Jun; 7(12):1-2. PubMed ID: 10266524 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. "Baby Doe": oral arguments before the Supreme Court. McCann RW Health Law Vigil; 1986 Jan; 9(2):1-3. PubMed ID: 10317677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Court of Appeals denies government access to records in case of Baby Jane Doe. Ahern ML Health Law Vigil; 1984 Mar; 7(5):1-3. PubMed ID: 10265234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Government petitions U.S. Supreme Court on Baby Doe regulations. Ahern ML Health Law Vigil; 1985 Apr; 8(7):9. PubMed ID: 10325192 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Federal court hears "Baby Doe" motions; admonishes HHS against enforcement of regulations. McCann RW Health Law Vigil; 1984 Mar; 7(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 10278230 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Court of Appeals reviews decision denying government access to records in case of Baby Jane Doe; AHA files brief in support of hospital. Tomaselli LA; Ahern ML Health Law Vigil; 1983 Dec; 6(26):1-2. PubMed ID: 10264307 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Baby Jane Doe case: does Section 504 of rehab law apply to hospitals? Weissburg C; Guth J Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1984; 17(2):59-60. PubMed ID: 10317455 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical groups' suit seeks to put legal padlock on 'Baby Doe' reg. Gibbons DL Med World News; 1984 Apr; 25(7):19, 23. PubMed ID: 10267469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Government intervention: "the Baby Doe rule". McCullough LB New Physician; 1983 May; 32(5):47-8. PubMed ID: 10262468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The case of Baby Jane Doe. Press A; Cooper N; Hager M; Howard L Newsweek; 1983 Nov; 102(22):45-6. PubMed ID: 10263113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. 'Baby Doe' controversy continuing. Krieger L Am Med News; 1983 May; 26(17):1, 14. PubMed ID: 10261416 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. ACP: Baby Doe rule should be revised. Am Coll Physicians Obs; 1983 Oct; 3(9):1, 12. PubMed ID: 10264533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The stormy legacy of Baby Doe. Wallis C; Constable A; Gribben S Time; 1983 Sep; 122(13):58. PubMed ID: 10262067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]