156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10263410)
1. Malpractice pressure spreads along new fronts.
Harsham P
Med Econ; 1983 Sep; 60(19):51-2, 56, 59 passim. PubMed ID: 10263410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Who is responsible in a department?].
Ronne Y
Vardfacket; 1985 Aug; 9(13-14):18-21. PubMed ID: 3852599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The trial of a malpractice case: part two.
Levine M
Med Malpract Cost Containment J; 1980 Jan; 1(4):277-96. PubMed ID: 10245234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fundamentals fundamental.
Avery JK
J Tenn Med Assoc; 1987 Dec; 80(12):738. PubMed ID: 3695471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Physician liable for procedural error.
Regan WA
Hosp Prog; 1982 Mar; 63(3):68. PubMed ID: 10254486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The trial of a malpractice case: Part one.
Levine M
Med Malpract Cost Containment J; 1979 Oct; 1(3):187-218. PubMed ID: 10244378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fetal monitoring problems during labor associated with most serious ob claims.
Clin Eng Inf Serv; 1984; 8(3):70-2. PubMed ID: 10267211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Lack of timely cesarean delivery constitutes actionable negligence.
Regan WA
Hosp Prog; 1983 Aug; 64(8):73-4. PubMed ID: 10261743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Husband won suit for emotional distress.
Regan WA
Hosp Prog; 1979 Jun; 60(6):74-5. PubMed ID: 437746
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Curb OB/GYN risk with experts' preventive techniques.
Hosp Risk Manage; 1981 Jul; 3(7):85-7. PubMed ID: 10251804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Incident report analysis: the experience of one large labor and delivery unit.
Robbins D
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs; 1987 Oct; 1(2):9-18. PubMed ID: 3451977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Michael Reese's new birthing suites may curb maternity malpractice suits.
Carter K
Mod Healthc; 1986 May; 16(11):48. PubMed ID: 10276438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Government-funded hospital may require physician to accept indigent patients.
Regan WA
Hosp Prog; 1984 Jan; 65(1):58. PubMed ID: 10264663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Exercising nurses' right to fight for clinical privileges.
Jenkins SM
Nurs Health Care; 1986 Nov; 7(9):476-82. PubMed ID: 3641108
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Hospital vindicated in sexual discrimination charge: gender can be a bona fide occupational qualification.
Hofstra PS
Health Law Vigil; 1982 Feb; 5(4):4-5. PubMed ID: 10254161
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. How a hospital bailed its OBGs out of malpractice trouble.
Bumke D
Med Econ; 1987 Aug; 64(16):21, 24-6. PubMed ID: 10283524
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [The use of occupational law in solving problems at obstetric-gynecologic facilities].
Langanke A; Retzke U; Langanke D
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1986; 80(18):769-71. PubMed ID: 3811411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Prevention of ulcero-necrotizing enterocolitis of the newborn in public and private gynecological and obstetrical services].
Rev Infirm; 1981 May; 31(9):68-70. PubMed ID: 6910095
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [A proposal for establishing a maternal-pediatric department in a general hospital].
Campobasso P; Fantuz E
Pediatr Med Chir; 1996; 18(6):573-6. PubMed ID: 9173404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Hospital liability, risk management, and the medical record.
Crane EJ; Reckard JM
Top Health Rec Manage; 1981 Sep; 2(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 10252572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]