181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10263492)
1. Decisions related to automation in microbiology.
Sodeman TM; Colmer J
Pathologist; 1983 Jun; 37(6):404-9. PubMed ID: 10263492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Selecting equipment and reagents: a personal experience and process.
Keffer JH
Pathologist; 1983 Jun; 37(6):410-3. PubMed ID: 10263493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Selecting instrumentation and reagents for the coagulation laboratory.
Wujastyk J; Triplett DA
Pathologist; 1983 Jun; 37(6):398-403. PubMed ID: 10263491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical lab: managing the products of automation.
Kernaghan SG
Hospitals; 1982 Aug; 56(16):75-9. PubMed ID: 7095783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A systematic procedure for selection of automated instruments in the clinical laboratory.
Shaikh AH
Am J Med Technol; 1979 Aug; 45(8):710-4. PubMed ID: 484579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How to select the ideal hematology analyzer.
Camden TL
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1993 Feb; 25(2):29-33. PubMed ID: 10124009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Y2K compliance report. Problems affecting clinical laboratory equipment.
Health Devices; 1999 Oct; 28(10):414-6. PubMed ID: 10533682
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Laboratory automation, Part 1. Total laboratory automation: a view of the 21st century.
Bauer S; Teplitz C
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1995 Jul; 27(7):22-5. PubMed ID: 10172381
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Selecting instruments for the stat lab.
Lifshitz MS; DeCresce RP
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1988 Sep; 20(9):51-4. PubMed ID: 10288727
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Selecting laboratory instrumentation. Part I.
De Cresce RP; Lifshitz MS
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1989 Feb; 21(2):76-9, 82-3. PubMed ID: 10303314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Selecting laboratory instrumentation. Part II.
De Cresce RP; Lifshitz MS
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1989 Mar; 21(3):73-5. PubMed ID: 10293719
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. In search of an analyzer: sifting through the offers.
West Y
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1984 Aug; 16(8):43-4, 46. PubMed ID: 10267473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Management improvements outpace clinical innovations.
Nathanson M
Mod Healthc; 1982 Oct; 12(10):109-10, 114. PubMed ID: 10256951
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Deciding on an inhouse chem profile instrument: a process that gives a profile of effective lab management.
Solanki B
Cost Containment; 1982 Jun; 4(11):1-2. PubMed ID: 10255904
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Equipment report: regs may jolt analyzer market.
LaViolette S
Mod Healthc; 1979 Sep; 9(9):53-4. PubMed ID: 460139
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The instrument selection process: beyond the sales pitch.
Barglowski M
MLO Med Lab Obs; 2001 Feb; 33(2):45-51. PubMed ID: 11236209
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Office lab equipment. Aids in selection and cost analysis.
Kroger JS
Consultant; 1987 Jul; 27(7):71-2, 75-7. PubMed ID: 10312732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Custom procedure trays. An overview.
Bomberg J
J Hosp Supply Process Distrib; 1984; 2(6):44-8. PubMed ID: 10269456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Selecting automation for the clinical chemistry laboratory.
Melanson SE; Lindeman NI; Jarolim P
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2007 Jul; 131(7):1063-9. PubMed ID: 17616992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microbiological safety cabinetry.
Kruse RH
Pathologist; 1983 Sep; 37(9):641-7. PubMed ID: 10263504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
