284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10263567)
1. Measuring productivity in medical record departments.
Barnes TW
Top Health Rec Manage; 1983 Dec; 4(2):19-31. PubMed ID: 10263567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Departmental productivity measurement/reporting in the medical record setting.
Kahl K; Kebisek J
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1989 Apr; 60(4):29-35. PubMed ID: 10292375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A modified time study: measuring medical records production.
McCrea-Hendrick D
Hosp Financ Manage; 1982 May; 36(5):54, 56-7. PubMed ID: 10255228
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Interim targeting: a productivity improvement method that works.
Kahl K; Peterson C; Dickson G
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1990 Apr; 61(4):31-9. PubMed ID: 10104362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Management study sets medical records performance standards.
Johnston WE
Hosp Financ Manage; 1979 Nov; 33(11):42-3, 46. PubMed ID: 10244280
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Development of productivity standards for medical record departments.
Kahl K; Kebisek J
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1989 Mar; 60(3):20-6. PubMed ID: 10318194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Productivity standards: a management skill for leaders in practice.
Boone B
Top Health Rec Manage; 1989 Mar; 9(3):57-67. PubMed ID: 10292320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of a medical record management control system through a work sampling study.
Schneider D; Appleton-Schneider L
Med Rec News; 1980 Jun; 51(3):18-24. PubMed ID: 10247322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Work sampling in medical record departments.
Bushardt SC; Fowler A; Debnath SC
J Am Med Rec Assoc (1980); 1982 Apr; 53(2):34-8. PubMed ID: 10255194
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A labor productivity monitoring system in the medical record department.
Kelm JM; Nelson AT; Schramm WR
Top Health Rec Manage; 1983 Dec; 4(2):32-46. PubMed ID: 10263568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Turning expectations into performance: administration's goals for medical record department influence productivity and effectiveness.
Ripple B
Tex Hosp; 1982 Oct; 38(5):9-10. PubMed ID: 10257732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Understanding the medical records department improves efficiency.
Micheletti JA; Schlala TJ
Healthc Financ Manage; 1987 Dec; 41(12):38, 40, 42 passim. PubMed ID: 10284877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The flow of charts in one medical record department.
Arnold G; Egger D
Med Rec News; 1978 Apr; 49(2):90-1, 93. PubMed ID: 10307027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical record department productivity standards: a case study.
Terlep M; Poli P
Top Health Rec Manage; 1983 Dec; 4(2):80-8. PubMed ID: 10263573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Word processing: a key to increased productivity in medical record departments.
Dennis A
Tex Hosp; 1982 Oct; 38(5):32-5. PubMed ID: 10257728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Preparing for prospective payment. Part V: Productivity in the medical record department.
Flanagan JB; Sourapas KJ
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1984 Mar; 55(3):23-5. PubMed ID: 10310455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Record ring: moving toward solutions--a quality control circle in a medical record department.
Karpel J; Spencer R; Schamberger T; Klein W
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1983 Jan; 54(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 10309816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Review and verification of roles and functions of medical record personnel.
Johnson OG; Cave C
Med Rec News; 1979 Jun; 50(3):25-35. PubMed ID: 10242270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Employee level productivity reporting in the medical record setting.
Kahl K; Kebisek J
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1989 May; 60(5):34-40. PubMed ID: 10292963
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Usage of PERT (project evaluation review techniques) networks in medical record practice.
Lovin FW
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1988 Jun; 59(6):48-51. PubMed ID: 10302485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
