284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10263567)
21. The effect of performance standards on productivity among medical record department employees.
Stich EK
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1990 Aug; 61(8):44-8. PubMed ID: 10105672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An alternative method for measuring workload. Part II.
Lindner CA; Helms AS; Shaw BW
MLO Med Lab Obs; 1986 Jun; 18(6):61-6. PubMed ID: 10277683
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Developing a unit of service to measure productivity.
Carpenter WW
Hosp Financ Manage; 1978 Jul; 32(7):14-6, 18. PubMed ID: 10307621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Implementing productivity improvements.
Van Kuran L; Lisbin SJ
Top Health Rec Manage; 1983 Dec; 4(2):11-8. PubMed ID: 10263566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Medical record work standards: some practical aspects.
Murphy CL
Top Health Rec Manage; 1983 Dec; 4(2):62-71. PubMed ID: 10263571
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Medical record productivity standards: one hospital's response.
Ladwig JP
Top Health Rec Manage; 1984 Sep; 5(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 10268135
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Coordination is key to increased productivity.
Hosp Superv Bull; 1983 Jan; (454):1-4. PubMed ID: 10258305
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Measuring productivity in word processing.
Wendling J
Dimens Health Serv; 1981 Jan; 58(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 7202880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Redesigning a medical record department: a case study.
Osborn CE; Bartha L
Top Health Rec Manage; 1988 Sep; 9(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 10302724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Utilization analysis facilitates cost control in nuclear medicine.
Schramm WR; Bray J
Hospitals; 1981 Apr; 55(8):64-5. PubMed ID: 7203431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The automated medical record: a practical realization?
Benjamin CD; Baum BH
Top Health Rec Manage; 1988 Sep; 9(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 10288791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Personal computer applications for the medical record department.
Garrison LS
Top Health Rec Manage; 1988 Jun; 8(4):54-63. PubMed ID: 10287513
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Managing a multihospital medical record department.
Patena KR
Top Health Rec Manage; 1988 Mar; 8(3):37-47. PubMed ID: 10286132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Combining productivity management standards and scheduling.
Wodrich J
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1986 Nov; 57(11):21-4. PubMed ID: 10280222
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. On-line medical record abstracting.
Bresnahan M; Cook J
Med Rec News; 1980 Apr; 51(2):17-25. PubMed ID: 10246922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Patient scheduling system improves productivity.
Blanken HM; Fromme GT; Toffler RB
Hospitals; 1981 Apr; 55(8):71-2. PubMed ID: 7203433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Monitoring system and realistic work standards: keys to improving transcription productivity.
Kahl K; Casey D
Top Health Rec Manage; 1983 Dec; 4(2):47-53. PubMed ID: 10263569
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Workload and staffing in the medical records department at Church Hospital.
Genovese D; Vaughan RG
Top Health Rec Manage; 1983 Dec; 4(2):72-9. PubMed ID: 10263572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Medical record leadership: creating organizational vitality.
Stein DS
Top Health Rec Manage; 1989 Mar; 9(3):7-13. PubMed ID: 10292322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Time and motion. Improving efficiency in radiation oncology.
Staples M
Adm Radiol; 1988 Sep; 7(9):35-6, 38-41. PubMed ID: 10290294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]