220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10265039)
1. An 'enlightened' view of employee committees under the Taft-Hartley Act.
Klaper MJ
Employee Relat Law J; 1983-1984 Winter; 9(3):474-84. PubMed ID: 10265039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Legal obstacles to alternative work-force designs.
Fasman ZD
Employee Relat Law J; 1982; 8(2):256-81. PubMed ID: 10257048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Health care institution labor law: case law developments, 1974-78.
Shepard IM
Am J Law Med; 1978; 4(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 685982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Union elections and the NLRB. The healthcare industry continues to challenge bargaining unit determinations.
Zimmerman DA; King GR
Health Prog; 1990; 71(1):96-101. PubMed ID: 10103410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The National Labor Relations Act: a potential legal constraint upon quality circles and other employer-sponsored employee committees.
Behrens CK; Sollenberger JR
Labor Law J; 1983 Dec; 34(12):776-80. PubMed ID: 10265365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Employee participation programs in the health care industry: are they unlawful under recent labor rulings?
Robinson RK; Fink RL; Fink LA
Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1995; 40(1):124-37. PubMed ID: 10140869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. "Totality"--right or wrong: the totality trilogy.
Lederer PC
Employee Relat Law J; 1981; 6(4):620-34. PubMed ID: 10250922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Labor Reform Act of 1977: a detailed analysis.
Nash PG
Employee Relat Law J; 1978; 4(1):59-80. PubMed ID: 10308047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Judicial review of NLRB rulemaking in the health care industry: implications for labor and management.
Redle DA; Rakich JS
Employee Relat Law J; 1990-1991 Winter; 16(3):333-6. PubMed ID: 10108860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Getting maximum value from employee teams--and keeping them legal.
McConnell CR
Health Care Superv; 1994 Sep; 13(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 10136987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A proposal for a nonreinstatement rule in unfair labor practice cases involving patient abuse.
Tully CT
Am J Law Med; 1985; 11(3):319-41. PubMed ID: 3842233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Special report. The new hospital labor picture: More unions? More strikes? More problems for security directors?
Hosp Secur Saf Manage; 1991 Aug; 12(4):5-10. PubMed ID: 10115074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. 1983-1984 Supreme Court term promises significant labor decisions.
Peterson RN
Health Law Vigil; 1983 Oct; 6(21):20-3. PubMed ID: 10317377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Supreme Court, 1978-79--labor relations and employment discrimination.
Modjeska L
Cornell Law Rev; 1979 Nov; 65(1):57-74. PubMed ID: 10245115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Is "ten days" really ten days?--the National Labor Relations Act's strike notice requirement in the healthcare industry.
King GR; Winchester JD; Rossman EM
J Health Law; 2004; 37(3):473-92. PubMed ID: 15648538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Limiting your risks in the new Russian roulette--discharging employees.
Brown F
Employee Relat Law J; 1982-1983 Winter; 8(3):380-406. PubMed ID: 10259904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hospital strikes: complying with NLRA notice requirements.
Kruchko JG; Fries JR
Employee Relat Law J; 1984; 9(4):566-79. PubMed ID: 10266112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Federal regulations of labor-management relations.
Davis CD
Tex Hosp; 1980 Aug; 36(3):40-1. PubMed ID: 10248196
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The National Labor Relations Act and employment-at-will: the federal preemption docrine revisited.
Zimmerman DA; Howard-Martin J
Labor Law J; 1986 Apr; 37(4):223-34. PubMed ID: 10276868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Supreme Court rejects longstanding labor rule for nurses. NLRB v. Health Care & Retirement Corp. of America.
Mahoney ME
Health Care Superv; 1995 Jun; 13(4):13-7. PubMed ID: 10184342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
