These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10265234)
1. Court of Appeals denies government access to records in case of Baby Jane Doe. Ahern ML Health Law Vigil; 1984 Mar; 7(5):1-3. PubMed ID: 10265234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Court of Appeals reviews decision denying government access to records in case of Baby Jane Doe; AHA files brief in support of hospital. Tomaselli LA; Ahern ML Health Law Vigil; 1983 Dec; 6(26):1-2. PubMed ID: 10264307 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Results of the Baby Jane Doe court cases: confidentiality 4; government access 0. Burda D J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1984 Jul; 55(7):19-21. PubMed ID: 10310699 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reporting the case of Baby Jane Doe. Kerr K Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Aug; 14(4):7-9. PubMed ID: 6237076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Court of Appeals denies government petition for rehearing in case of handicapped infant. Ahern ML Health Law Vigil; 1984 May; 7(11):1-2. PubMed ID: 10266523 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Government abandons efforts to obtain records of "Baby Jane Doe"; in AHA v. Heckler, government motion filed in Second Circuit denied. Ahern ML Health Law Vigil; 1984 Aug; 7(18):1-2. PubMed ID: 10317498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The case of Baby Jane Doe. Press A; Cooper N; Hager M; Howard L Newsweek; 1983 Nov; 102(22):45-6. PubMed ID: 10263113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Baby Jane Doe case: does Section 504 of rehab law apply to hospitals? Weissburg C; Guth J Rev Fed Am Hosp; 1984; 17(2):59-60. PubMed ID: 10317455 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. AHA files brief in U.S. Supreme Court in "Baby Doe" case. Ahern ML Health Law Vigil; 1985 Nov; 8(23):1-2. PubMed ID: 10317657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Baby Doe: AHA prevails in Supreme Court. Ahern ML Health Law Vigil; 1986 Jun; 9(12):1-4. PubMed ID: 10276708 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. District Court judge invalidates Baby Doe regulations. Ahern ML Health Law Vigil; 1984 Jun; 7(12):1-2. PubMed ID: 10266524 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Government intervention: "the Baby Doe rule". McCullough LB New Physician; 1983 May; 32(5):47-8. PubMed ID: 10262468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Federal court hears "Baby Doe" motions; admonishes HHS against enforcement of regulations. McCann RW Health Law Vigil; 1984 Mar; 7(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 10278230 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The 1983 Supreme Court abortion decisions: impact on hospitals, a conflict with Baby Doe? Carlson RA Health Law Vigil; 1983 Oct; 6(21):2-7. PubMed ID: 10263291 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Congress faces fragile compromise on 'Baby Doe'. Med World News; 1984 Aug; 25(16):6-7, 10. PubMed ID: 10268025 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Backsliding on "Baby Doe"? Med World News; 1985 Mar; 26(5):11, 15. PubMed ID: 10317572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In the matter of Baby Jane Doe: does Reagan really agree with us? Biklen DP; Ferguson PM Soc Policy; 1984; 15(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 10317522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. 'Baby Doe' regulation still agitates with revision 3. Med World News; 1984 Feb; 25(3):14-5. PubMed ID: 10317427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Supreme Court and Baby Jane Doe. Drinan RF America (NY); 1986 Mar; 154(9):180-2. PubMed ID: 11658666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medical groups' suit seeks to put legal padlock on 'Baby Doe' reg. Gibbons DL Med World News; 1984 Apr; 25(7):19, 23. PubMed ID: 10267469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]