These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10265234)

  • 21. Government petitions U.S. Supreme Court on Baby Doe regulations.
    Ahern ML
    Health Law Vigil; 1985 Apr; 8(7):9. PubMed ID: 10325192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Final judgment issued in case challenging Baby Doe regulations.
    Ahern ML
    Health Law Vigil; 1984 Jun; 7(13):1-2. PubMed ID: 10317462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Supreme Court ruling to affect some hospitals.
    Hospitals; 1979 May; 53(10):24. PubMed ID: 372085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. 'Baby Doe' controversy continuing.
    Krieger L
    Am Med News; 1983 May; 26(17):1, 14. PubMed ID: 10261416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. ACP: Baby Doe rule should be revised.
    Am Coll Physicians Obs; 1983 Oct; 3(9):1, 12. PubMed ID: 10264533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The stormy legacy of Baby Doe.
    Wallis C; Constable A; Gribben S
    Time; 1983 Sep; 122(13):58. PubMed ID: 10262067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Perspectives. Baby Doe reconsidered.
    Wash Rep Med Health; 1984 Jan; 38(3):suppl 4p. PubMed ID: 10317416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. As I see it: Baby Doe.
    Jellison MD
    Trustee; 1984 Jan; 37(1):47. PubMed ID: 10264502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Legal review: access to adoption records--recent developments in case and statutory law.
    Roach WH
    Top Health Rec Manage; 1991 Mar; 11(3):81-7. PubMed ID: 10110016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. AHA files motion to have Baby Doe regulations declared invalid.
    Ahern ML
    Health Law Vigil; 1984 Mar; 7(6):1-2. PubMed ID: 10265236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reagan Administration revises "Baby Doe" regulations.
    Iglehart JK
    Hosp Prog; 1984 Feb; 65(2):17, 20. PubMed ID: 10317422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Baby Doe legislation passes in the House...despite newly adopted HHS regulations on the care of handicapped infants.
    Prout DM
    Am Coll Physicians Obs; 1984 Mar; 4(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 10266046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. 'Baby Doe' proposed reg suffers setback in court.
    Med World News; 1983 Dec; 24(23):27. PubMed ID: 11645566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. HHS reissues "Baby Doe" regulations; provider concerns remain unaddressed.
    McCann RW
    Health Law Vigil; 1983 Jul; 6(14):1-3. PubMed ID: 10260939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On the question of Baby Doe.
    Asch A
    Health PAC Bull; 1986 Aug; 16(6):6, 8-10. PubMed ID: 10277562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perspectives. The continuing saga of Baby Doe.
    Wash Rep Med Health; 1984 Aug; 38(32):suppl 4p. PubMed ID: 10317510
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. On the question of Baby Doe.
    Rothman BK
    Health PAC Bull; 1986 Aug; 16(6):7, 11-3. PubMed ID: 10277563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Baby Doe compromise shifts burden to state protection agencies.
    Wallace C
    Mod Healthc; 1984 Nov; 14(14):27-8. PubMed ID: 10268799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Perspectives. Baby Doe: HHS, Congress & the courts.
    Wash Rep Med Health; 1983 Aug; 37(30):4p. PubMed ID: 10262597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prescriptions for Baby Doe.
    Stein J
    Natl J (Wash); 1983 May; 15(20):1021. PubMed ID: 10259832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.